A druid was a member of the high-ranking priestly class in ancient Celtic cultures. Druids were religious leaders as well as legal authorities, adjudicators, lorekeepers, medical professionals and political advisors. Druids left no written accounts. While they were reported to have been literate, they are believed to have been prevented by doctrine from recording their knowledge in written form. Their beliefs and practices are attested in some detail by their contemporaries from other cultures, such as the Romans and the Greeks.
The earliest known references to the druids date to the 4th century BCE. They were described by other Roman writers such as Cicero, Tacitus, and Pliny the Elder. Following the Roman invasion of Gaul, the druid orders were suppressed by the Roman government under the 1st-century CE emperors Tiberius and Claudius, and had disappeared from the written record by the 2nd century.
In about 750 CE, the word druid appears in a poem by Blathmac, who wrote about Jesus, saying that he was "better than a prophet, more knowledgeable than every druid, a king who was a bishop and a complete sage." The druids appear in some of the medieval tales from Christianized Ireland like "Táin Bó Cúailnge", where they are largely portrayed as sorcerers who opposed the coming of Christianity. In the wake of the Celtic revival during the 18th and 19th centuries, fraternal and neopagan groups were founded based on ideas about the ancient druids, a movement known as Neo-Druidism.
Societal role and training
The Greco-Roman and the vernacular Irish sources agree that the druids played an important part in pagan Celtic society. In his description, Julius Caesar wrote that they were one of the two most important social groups in the region (alongside the equites, or nobles) and were responsible for organizing worship and sacrifices, divination, and judicial procedure in Gallic, British, and Irish societies.
Two other classical writers, Diodorus Siculus and Strabo, wrote about the role of druids in Gallic society, stating that the druids were held in such respect that if they intervened between two armies they could stop the battle.
Druidic lore consisted of a large number of verses learned by heart, and Caesar remarked that it could take up to twenty years to complete the course of study. What was taught to druid novices anywhere is conjecture: of the druids' oral literature, not one certifiably ancient verse is known to have survived, even in translation. All instruction was communicated orally, but for ordinary purposes, Caesar reports, the Gauls had a written language in which they used Greek letters. In this he probably draws on earlier writers; by the time of Caesar, Gaulish inscriptions had moved from Greek script to Latin script.
Philosophy
With regard to their actual course of studies, the main object of all education is, in their opinion, to imbue their scholars with a firm belief in the indestructibility of the human soul, which, according to their belief, merely passes at death from one tenement to another; for by such doctrine alone, they say, which robs death of all its terrors, can the highest form of human courage be developed. Subsidiary to the teachings of this main principle, they hold various lectures and discussions on the stars and their movement, on the extent and geographical distribution of the earth, on the different branches of natural philosophy, and on many problems connected with religion.
- Julius Caesar
Druids in mythology
Druids play a prominent role in Irish folklore, generally serving lords and kings as high ranking priest-counselors with the gift of prophecy and other assorted mystical abilities – the best example of these possibly being Cathbad. The chief druid in the court of King Conchobar mac Nessa of Ulster, Cathbad features in several tales, most of which detail his ability to foretell the future. In the tale of Deirdre of the Sorrows – the foremost tragic heroine of the Ulster Cycle – the druid prophesied before the court of Conchobar that Deirdre would grow up to be very beautiful, and that kings and lords would go to war over her, much blood would be shed because of her, and Ulster's three greatest warriors would be forced into exile for her sake. This prophecy, ignored by the king, came true.
The greatest of these mythological druids was Amergin Glúingel, a bard and judge for the Milesians featured in the Mythological Cycle. The Milesians were seeking to overrun the Tuatha Dé Danann and win the land of Ireland but, as they approached, the druids of the Tuatha Dé Danann raised a magical storm to bar their ships from making landfall. Thus Amergin called upon the spirit of Ireland itself, chanting a powerful incantation that has come to be known as The Song of Amergin and, eventually (after successfully making landfall), aiding and dividing the land between his royal brothers in the conquest of Ireland, earning the title Chief Ollam of Ireland.
Female druids
Irish mythology has a number of female druids, often sharing similar prominent cultural and religious roles with their male counterparts. The Irish have several words for female druids, such as bandruí ("woman-druid"), found in tales such as Táin Bó Cúailnge; Bodhmall, featured in the Fenian Cycle, and one of Fionn mac Cumhaill's childhood caretakers; and Tlachtga, daughter of the druid Mug Ruith who, according to Irish tradition, is associated with the Hill of Ward, site of prominent festivals held in Tlachtga's honour during the Middle Ages.
According to classical authors, the Gallizenae (or Gallisenae) were virgin priestesses of the Île de Sein off Pointe du Raz, Finistère, western Brittany. Their existence was first mentioned by the Greek geographer Artemidorus Ephesius and later by the Greek historian Strabo, who wrote that their island was forbidden to men, but the women came to the mainland to meet their husbands. Which deities they honored is unknown. According to Pomponius Mela, the Gallizenae acted as both councilors and practitioners of the healing arts.
History of reception
In the Gallic Wars of 58–51 BC, the Roman army, led by Julius Caesar, conquered the many tribal chiefdoms of Gaul, and annexed it as a part of the Roman Republic. According to accounts produced in the following centuries, the new rulers of Roman Gaul subsequently introduced measures to wipe out the druids from that country. According to Pliny the Elder, writing in the 70s CE, it was the emperor Tiberius (ruled 14–37 CE), who introduced laws banning not only druid practices, and other native soothsayers and healers.
The best evidence of a druidic tradition in the British Isles is the independent cognate of the Celtic *druwid- in Insular Celtic: The Old Irish druídecht survives in the meaning of 'magic', and the Welsh dryw in the meaning of 'seer'.
While the druids as a priestly caste were extinct with the Christianization of Wales, complete by the 7th century at the latest, the offices of bard and of "seer" (Welsh: dryw) persisted in medieval Wales into the 13th century.
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- ❤️ Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 💖 Come talk in the New Monthly queer thread
- 💛 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⭐️ October Movie Nominations ⭐️
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes struggle sessions over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can go here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
- 💙Comprehensive list of resources for those in need of an abortion -- reddit link
- 💙Resources for Palestine
Theory:
Maybe it betrays neuroticism, manipulation, people pleasing and/or lack of confidence. Not that thats you.
I do have a lack of confidence though
Thats dumb, you dont really have a choice in the matter. Who else is going to love you? Why do I need to pick up after you?
^Hypothetical person lizard brain thought when you say sorry excessively^
What??
I think people can sense lack of confidence from someone who apologizes too much. I also believe that people who lack confidence are being a little selfish in a way, because theyre not doing their personal responsibility of taking care of themselves and loving themselves, loving yourself I believe is also a non-negotiable. I think most people intuit this even if they can't apply this idea to themselves and it makes them look down on you.
This feels kinda gross somehow
The phrase "personal responsibility" probably triggered you.
Ideally, I think everyone should respect who people are and where they are in their journey regarding maturity and self-actualization but it's obviously way more complicated than that especially if you don't know the person already.
Most people don't want to pick up emotional slack for someone who is unwilling/unable to do it for themselves, especially for strangers.
I feel like it makes people exclude people who have already been pretty brutally harshed on. Like, oh, you were abused as an infant? I am disgusted by you and think you deserved it. Most of these kinds of affects are drilled into us at an early age, and plenty of people don't have to do the "work" because they grew up with secure attachments. Judging people for it just seems shit
That said, I have intense frustration with people that I talk to who alternate between fawning and overconfidently belligerent. Clearly something going on there.
So you're basically describing me just so we're on the same page, my childhood was awful.
I don't think most people intellectualize someone's lack of confidence. I don't think people think "you had a bad childhood, it's your fault and i am grossed out by you." People can't intuit your whole lifestory, they just see the end result. It's emotions and social cues. All people know is when you don't have it (the sauce) and through that they deem that they should avoid you, or don't have to care about you or sometimes even treat you kindly. I'm not saying that's good, I'm just describing how I see it. No one cares about your past unless they already know you and it's a very dog chasing tail situation.
I also agree it's bullshit that people get to skip the "work" because they had healthy relationships and were fostered good mental habits early on (and that it's a lot of non-poors that describe this) but that's life too, there are a lot of people who skip the work and are absolute shitheads because of it. I'd rather stop the cycle and atleast be cognizant and proactive towards my issues before I go and make it someone elses problem.
Sauce?
It's hard to tease apart justification with explanation. Even if that was the reason, we should fight against it. If someone in your community is hurting, it should be a duty of everyone else to help a little. After all, our current society demands us all to be selfish, paranoid, calculating "rational" outcomes for maximum benefit, and we're ostensibly on a forum that is fighting against that.
But also some of it is just cultural affect. Firmly shaking hands just shows that you were brought up in a culture where that was the norm. Same with linguistic things like fillers. I had a friend whose parents taught him that saying "um" or "uh" shows a lack of confidence. I know other people who think saying "probably " or "most likely" is a lack of confidence.
Idk, I personally dislike being judged for such things. Maybe that's all this is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0-F88c6Hrk
Haha I don't know if that helped. I guessed it was confidence, but I know plenty of people who are socially magnetic who are very anxious. They just don't seem to trigger the disgust reaction lentil is talking about.
(My other tries of sauce =source and sauce = alcohol were way off)
It's a clumsy metaphor that's he ad-libbing the fuck out of, but I think he's speaking the truth
I think you can be anxious and confidence. Or there could be circumstances/situations/people that draw out the "better" parts of someone's personality. Or they could have something that other people want (money/talent/good looks) I try to not judge myself when I feel anxious or socially out of my depth, maybe all my life experiences don't add up to getting along or gelling with someone specific 100%. Like it's cool to be anxious and to be authentic to who you are and what you're feeling, I personally don't want to be anyone else but me. So if that means i get anxious around rich white kids, that's what it is.
Also, I feel like "gelling" with someone only gets worse as you get older too so it's kind of important you learn how to pick yourself and accepting that not everyone is going to be cool with you. Additionally, I feel like picking yourself and loving yourself is not a binary state, sometimes you just fucking hate your life and everything and you have to pick up the pieces and dust yourself off like nothing happened. It is what it is.
idk, internally I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, I can't translate what an outward "lack of confidence" means to someone's deep inner world. I have some trauma triggers that people trip. The outward lack of confidence that service workers exhibit towards customers (lots of sorries, apologies for minor mistakes, constant deference, the fake smile, the "look" that says "please don't make this any more than it is" etc etc) we (should) recognise as coming from the outside and thus we should not feel disgust towards them if they slip up at their job and they start doing this. The same can apply for everyone else, but the stressors are coming from elsewhere.
If someone gets angry at me because I said "Sorry" while shuffling past or "I can probably do this" instead of "out of my way" or "I can do this", that's a problem with them and an indication that they do not want me around.