Yeah, it seems like as long as you have decent enough weaponry to counter your enemies air-superiority then really fancy tech doesn't get you very far. Guys with iron site AKs can own guys with kitted out M4s with night vision scopes and a butt attachment that makes the soldiers personalized protein smoothies.
And even old artillery is incredibly accurate if the team operating the gun has both modern targeting computer software and access to localized real-time meteorological data. When you throw in the use of aerial drone spotters, that old artillery performs almost as well as the highly integrated artillery systems NATO nations field.
It's funny because the actual gun isn't where any of a magic of modern artillery is but instead the targeting computer and data links. US defense contractors just upcharge to integrate all that tech into a single piece of equipment and disregard all the drawbacks involved.
Yeah, it seems like as long as you have decent enough weaponry to counter your enemies air-superiority then really fancy tech doesn't get you very far. Guys with iron site AKs can own guys with kitted out M4s with night vision scopes and a butt attachment that makes the soldiers personalized protein smoothies.
I think in this specific case it's old artillery with unlimited shells beats fancy vundervvaffen artillery with very limited and expensive shells.
And even old artillery is incredibly accurate if the team operating the gun has both modern targeting computer software and access to localized real-time meteorological data. When you throw in the use of aerial drone spotters, that old artillery performs almost as well as the highly integrated artillery systems NATO nations field.
It's funny because the actual gun isn't where any of a magic of modern artillery is but instead the targeting computer and data links. US defense contractors just upcharge to integrate all that tech into a single piece of equipment and disregard all the drawbacks involved.