But what do you do when the concession literally is not possible without either revolution or the threat of it?
I don't think that's the case right now, I think there's a lot you can do if you were willing to govern.
Conversely, what do you do with people who want to be given a ladder so they can pull it up after themselves?
I don't know what people you are talking about but if it's "the people" in first world countries generally I also don't think that's the case, much less so if we're talking about the parlamentarian communist parties.
Are you this committed to tailist bullshit in the name of the "Masses" that you're laundering your positions through?
Meaningless statement, I want to improve people's lives as best as I can that's my position. You tell them you don't want that and see how the look of disdain they give you.
Allying with them to oppose their political enemies does not prove that it wasn't their shitty ideology that enabled the fascists to snowball in the first place.
I don't disagree but that isn't my understanding of what calling someone, especially someone on the far-left today, a "social fascist" means
I don't think that's the case right now, I think there's a lot you can do if you were willing to govern.
I don't know what people you are talking about but if it's "the people" in first world countries generally I also don't think that's the case, much less so if we're talking about the parlamentarian communist parties.
Meaningless statement, I want to improve people's lives as best as I can that's my position. You tell them you don't want that and see how the look of disdain they give you.
I don't disagree but that isn't my understanding of what calling someone, especially someone on the far-left today, a "social fascist" means