Permanently Deleted

  • Tachanka [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    so how do we draw the line between something we legalize for harm mitigation and something we keep criminalized and come down hard on the black market for?

    rape, murder, and child pornography aren't drugs and alcohol. That's where the line is.

    Moreover, would a socialist West (and I say West specifically because material conditions elsewhere are different) keep some of the more destructive drugs illegal, or does the line of harm minimization fall above all forms of drugs?

    the problem is criminalization of the substances themselves and not their unregulated manufacture and distribution. Why is possession and use lumped in with distribution? Because porky-happy needs prison slaves

    EDIT: Also let's be real, there's a race and class element to this as well. Some wall street schmuck can do a line of coke off his desk at work/home every day and a cop will never catch him because he is in a privately owned space and public law enforcers don't see him as priority. Public law enforces want to get poor addicts out of public spaces where their continued existence bothers the sensibilities of the petit bourgeoisie and into jail where their continued existence is converted into slave labor.

    • Riffraffintheroom [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Public law enforces want to get poor addicts out of public spaces where their continued existence bothers the sensibilities of the petit bourgeoisi

      Friday in Toronto two dealers who sold near a safe injection site started shooting at each other. They missed each other but shit a random woman multiple times. Her petit bourgeoisie sensibilities were so offended by these gunshot wounds that she died. What a square.

      • Tachanka [comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I'm talking about how the police funnel addicts into prison where they are exploited as slaves. You're talking about a (sample size of 1 anecdote) dealers shooting at each other at a safe injection site. I'm not talking about dealers, I'm talking about criminalization of addicts, and of possession with the intent to use rather than distribute. I'm talking about why this problem can't be solved in a capitalist political economy. Your response seems only tangentially to my post. Not sure what your intention is, here.

        • Riffraffintheroom [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re talking about safe injection sites and peoples opposition to them in the context of the shift of opinion on the war on drugs amongst liberals and lefties, which includes the environments that form around safe injection sites. I agree that this problem can’t be solved in a capitalist political economy. I’m not sure why you’re confused. I’m taking part in the discussion same as you.

          • Tachanka [comrade/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure why you’re confused.

            I'm not confused. you're responding to my comment that didn't bring up safe injection sites at all with a (sample size of 1 anecdote) dealers shooting at each other at a safe injection site. Your response to my comment had nothing to do with my comment. Typically when you respond to someone you respond directly to what they said.