China’s fast-fashion retailer Shein is facing a lawsuit that claims the clothing maker’s copyright infringement is so aggressive that it amounts to racketeering.
The filing this week, by three fashion designers in a United States court, claims that Shein is in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, better known as RICO, a law originally crafted to prosecute organised crime.
“Shein has grown rich by committing individual infringements over and over again, as part of a long and continuous pattern of racketeering, which shows no sign of abating,” the filing said.
In an organised effort to create as many as 6,000 new items per day, Shein has used a “byzantine shell game of a corporate structure” to rip off designers, a coordinated illegal operation that can best be combated through the use of RICO statutes, according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit is just the latest in a series of difficulties Shein has faced. In May, a bipartisan group of two dozen lawmakers asked the Securities and Exchange Commission to put the brakes on an initial public offering by Shein until it verified that it does not use forced labour from the country’s predominantly Muslim Uighur population.
The lawsuit, filed by three fashion designers in the US District Court for the Central District of California, alleged that “Shein produced, distributed, and sold exact copies of their creative work.”
“At issue here, inexplicably, are truly exact copies of copyrightable graphic design appearing on Shein products,” the civil lawsuit states.
Shein did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Associated Press on Friday.
The designers are seeking unspecified damages and want injunctive relief to prevent further racketeering activity.
Shein has not said whether it plans to go public this year, but there have been reports that the company was raising money in anticipation of a US listing before the end of the year.
Shein spokesperson Peter Pernot-Day has said the company takes transparency across its entire supply chain seriously.
But a Congressional report last month unloaded a blistering critique of Shein and another Chinese fashion retailer, Temu.
The report is part of a continuing Congressional investigation into products offered to American consumers that could be made with forced labour in China. As part of the probe, the committee sent letters in early May to brands Nike and Adidas, as well as Shein and Temu asking for information about their compliance with the anti-forced labour law.
Shein said at the time that the company’s “policy is to comply with the customs and import laws of the countries in which we operate.” It also said it has “zero tolerance” for forced labor and has implemented a robust system to ensure compliance with US law.
Love how they're jamming in the forced labor bit. Obviously the labor is no more forced than it is under any other American company that has foreign factories. Also, didn't AP report that the uighur work camps were dissolved a couple years back?
Also, didn't AP report that the uighur work camps were dissolved a couple years back?
Yeah. The reeducation and vocational training facilities were closed down once the influx of young men returning home who dabbled with ISIS and Al Queda dropped to a trickle. Still not sure what western media expected them to do as an alternative... is the GITMO for life, drone strike, or revoking citizenship solution the US/EU uses more humane than actually taking the steps to reintegrate people who got caught up in radicalizion while working abroad in the middle east?
"Zero tolerance" for forced labor? Then how come all our uniforms are made by Amerikkkan prison labor?
On one hand
Showhaha yes die fast fashion industry
On the other hand
I hate copyright laws that enforce American corporate supremacyIt's unfair, they're only marking things up by 90% instead of 1000% like honest American companies.
