No but you see it doesn’t plagiarize since it analyzes general trends (from human art and writing scanned and used without permission) and since it’s not directly piecing sentences or visual art together like scavenged puzzle pieces then you clearly cannot be offended
I wouldn't worry about it tbh this is what spending half a billion dollars on making a LLM gets you and it's both shit and unprofitable
I don't imagine 1 billion dollars gets you much more data than 0.5 does and would assume that the returns diminish drastically. And as training data is the real bottleneck in machine learning production I think chatGPT actually demonstrates that LLM's are an infeasible proposition
deleted by creator
it's more a making things up machine that was built with plagerism.
It's not good at plagerism because everything it makes is shitty
No but you see it doesn’t plagiarize since it analyzes general trends (from human art and writing scanned and used without permission) and since it’s not directly piecing sentences or visual art together like scavenged puzzle pieces then you clearly cannot be offended
I wouldn't worry about it tbh this is what spending half a billion dollars on making a LLM gets you and it's both shit and unprofitable
I don't imagine 1 billion dollars gets you much more data than 0.5 does and would assume that the returns diminish drastically. And as training data is the real bottleneck in machine learning production I think chatGPT actually demonstrates that LLM's are an infeasible proposition