I can't talk about good vs bad writing, but ChatGPT's issue is the same as AI image generation.
It's just a surface-level resemblance to the thing it's generating without any understanding behind it.
Any time it's answering a unique question, there's no underlying cohesive thought, and when it's answering non-unique questions, it's just plagiarizing multiple people.
Sounds like bad writing but I suppose profs who didn't do dick to bring writing up to the collegiete level saw that from their students and AI and connected bad dots.
I just always hated thst I was a bit older and they wanted my job to help everyone. So I would go on tirades about how nobody gets their $$$ worth. Was me thesis too
I can't talk about good vs bad writing, but ChatGPT's issue is the same as AI image generation.
It's just a surface-level resemblance to the thing it's generating without any understanding behind it. Any time it's answering a unique question, there's no underlying cohesive thought, and when it's answering non-unique questions, it's just plagiarizing multiple people.
Sounds like bad writing but I suppose profs who didn't do dick to bring writing up to the collegiete level saw that from their students and AI and connected bad dots.
I just always hated thst I was a bit older and they wanted my job to help everyone. So I would go on tirades about how nobody gets their $$$ worth. Was me thesis too