It's absolutely wild that the DNC emails which proved internal corruption at the DNC between the top democrats and the media... are considered more important to the US than trying to forcefully suppress the videos of mass murders happening by US military.
Also kind of expected since liberals will tell you, straight faced, that the video of them killing the Reuters reporters and the other people "wasn't a war crime." "... uh, how isn't it?" Would be the first question from basically everyone with a brain. "Because the US said they were terrorists." Oh. Ok.
So, it just seems to me that those in charge view the war crimes videos as "settled" and not negative for the US. While they see the email stuff as an ongoing, never ending source of annoyance for the DNC/Hillary/MSM and so it needs to stomped down. Obviously the emails are already out for years now and not much they can do about that, but it does say and show so much of what is wrong with these people's brains. They'd rather some video of Hillary personally executing a Libyan child came out and be subsequently explained away by the CIA as justified than ever have to talk about how the media fed her questions before debates ever again. Just totally twisted people. That's how I read it anyway.
Were documents regarding the Iraq war not included in this plea deal also? I don't have the time to go looking myself, but maybe the DNC emails are the focused concern of the tweet author (idk who the fuck mario nawfal is, seems like a scumbag wallstreet type from a quick search) but is not the primary concern (or at least not the only concern) to the US legal system.
Idk, i find it hard to believe the DNC emails are actually more important to the state dept. than the Iraq documents. It's not surprising that they are more relevant to political agents, but from a security-department perspective those are irrelevant, or so i would have thought.
It's absolutely wild that the DNC emails which proved internal corruption at the DNC between the top democrats and the media... are considered more important to the US than trying to forcefully suppress the videos of mass murders happening by US military.
Also kind of expected since liberals will tell you, straight faced, that the video of them killing the Reuters reporters and the other people "wasn't a war crime." "... uh, how isn't it?" Would be the first question from basically everyone with a brain. "Because the US said they were terrorists." Oh. Ok.
So, it just seems to me that those in charge view the war crimes videos as "settled" and not negative for the US. While they see the email stuff as an ongoing, never ending source of annoyance for the DNC/Hillary/MSM and so it needs to stomped down. Obviously the emails are already out for years now and not much they can do about that, but it does say and show so much of what is wrong with these people's brains. They'd rather some video of Hillary personally executing a Libyan child came out and be subsequently explained away by the CIA as justified than ever have to talk about how the media fed her questions before debates ever again. Just totally twisted people. That's how I read it anyway.
The equivalent of vietnam war soldiers being okay with massacring villages, but being offended when some hippie calls them baby killers
Were documents regarding the Iraq war not included in this plea deal also? I don't have the time to go looking myself, but maybe the DNC emails are the focused concern of the tweet author (idk who the fuck mario nawfal is, seems like a scumbag wallstreet type from a quick search) but is not the primary concern (or at least not the only concern) to the US legal system.
Idk, i find it hard to believe the DNC emails are actually more important to the state dept. than the Iraq documents. It's not surprising that they are more relevant to political agents, but from a security-department perspective those are irrelevant, or so i would have thought.
Honestly haven't looked into it that far. I agree with you though