let's mount a 150mm cannon on the tiniest tank chassis we have, what could go wrong

Due to its cramped interior and the large size of the ammunition required for the gun, only three spare rounds were transported in the vehicle. This would limit the effectiveness of the sIG 33 auf Pz. I if the supporting ammunition carriers could not reach them for whatever reason.

The weight of the 15 cm gun and the additional armor plates was simply too much for the weak Panzer I tank’s chassis. This overloading often resulted in many transmission and suspension breakdowns.

The main gun recoil during fire was so strong that the vehicle would wildly shake and could be thrown back.

The high profile was a big problem for the sIG 33 auf Pz. I too, making it an easy target for enemy artillery gunners.

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
    ·
    4 days ago

    It gives me joy to know that more than one dumbass Nazi engineer signed off on this.

    • Tervell [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 days ago

      what's even better is they pulled the "mount an overly large cannon on a chassis that can barely support it" move again after this, twice

      Show
      Show

      (there was also the Elefant/Ferdinand, but in its case the reliability issues were more related to the hull itself and the weird-ass petro-electric drive Porsche came up)

      • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
        ·
        4 days ago

        It makes sense in the logic of trying to instill fear at the sight of the weapon. But if that doesn't break the opponent, there's no plan B.