Hello comrades, I'm looking for some guidance on understanding degrowth.
It seems very idealistic. Where they hope their work can convince people on an individual level, then on an organizational level, to influence policy which creates targets that will decrease environmental impact (that is the main contradiction) and subsequently profit-seeking.
I think some part acknowledges that quality of life with respect to material possessions is sufficient for people in the global north, and they can be content with their current conditions and improve things like community with a decreased emphasis on growth. There isn't a base theory or mechanism to understand or explain how humans and societies work like historical materialism or dialectical materialism in ML. It does seem to rely on ecological thinking, e.g. carrying capacity. Maybe the idea is that there is a physical limit, we can acknowledge it and work around it for the best outcome for all people rather than butt heads against it after consequences emerge.
This doesn't seem to operate at the level of human societies which I think is a bit confusing. You can take something from ecology but its application needs a robust set of auxiliary theories to explain how it operates at the level of human society. It also seems there is wishful thinking about how movements like this work historically and there are inherently groups (i.e. classes, but they don't seem to indicate this in another form) which are the causes of this. Am I correct to assume this is a reactionary response to current political problems using some of the language of Marxism without any of the fundamental understanding?
I can't shake the idea that believers of this think the solution will 'magically' emerge if enough people agree with it or are educated on it. Accepting that the bourgeois will not relinquish their control after understanding and that their lack of cooperation is a feature of their class interest and not 'needing to be educated enough' is just ignored?
Any commentary or analysis would be really appreciated, my thoughts are a bit jumbled.
Here's a website for this someone shared with me recently: https://degrowth.info/en/degrowth
I see degrowth less as an ideal to strive for and more as an inevitable outcome (we will be forced to do it, like it or not).
To do it humanely will require equitable distribution of resources and central planning. Then maybe we can get to a place where we have reasonable ecological footprints in the global north. Note this is NOT return to monke.
Of course if we continue to pursue the status quo of extractive capitalism, fossil fuel reliance etc, then we will be returning to monke, against our will.
I know this isn’t the analysis you asked for just my 2c