Permanently Deleted

  • Codemancer@lemm.ee
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “Provides more security than windows”

    This is the only one I seriously doubt.

    Ms defender is actually something I wish we had a replacement for.

    Read only root fs is a start, but it doesn’t protect my documents.

    Like your linux doesn’t get hacked because no one cares, if we become a target we are helpless more or less.

    • moreeni@lemm.ee
      ·
      5 months ago

      And there are still people who will downvote you for saying that Linux distros are not impregnable fortresses of OS security

    • featured [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      5 months ago

      Linux can be secured on much deeper levels than windows, by default yes it lacks antivirus but its also much less necessary given the software distribution model of Linux vs windows. But ClamAV is a decent antivirus that I use on my Linux server. Never felt the need for one on my workstation/laptop

    • Titou [she/her]
      ·
      4 months ago

      We are probably already a target, at least for servers.

  • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve been using Linux between 2018-2020 and on and off between 2020-2023 and regained daily status on November last year. It’s been great, but some things like lacking a proper office replacement (Only Office (FOSS), FreeOffice (Free as in beer), and WPS Office (Free as in beer) are all getting closer) are a bit limiting. Some stuff like lacking VRR and HDR were annoying (getting fixed now) and gaming has been improving. Game compatibility sometimes is a bit of a sore spot, but it’s been getting ever easier and honestly, haven’t had issues with NVIDIA drivers under wayland

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don't think Windows uses a microkernel. Hybrid kernel is the term I've heard used.

  • aktenkundig@discuss.tchncs.de
    ·
    5 months ago

    Some spontaneous thoughts Linux:

    • Awesome development environment
    • Awesome software management (apt, zypper, etc)
    • Great choice of desktop environments
    • Gazillions of distros (comes with need to make a choice) Windows
    • Great support for Nvidia drivers
    • Great subsystem for Linux
  • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    5 months ago

    Your ability to ride the fence is admirable OP, don't let anyone take it from you 🙏

  • Soviet Pigeon@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Linux Kernel provides more security techniques than Windows indeed, but they need to be used. To point out CVEs is kind of stupid. The Linux kernel never commited any entries to the CVE database for years, they started since February 2024 doing so, because they gave up on their opposition. They warned, if they do this now, the databases will get flooded with CVEs. Because in the kernel context, every bug counts as a security problem, if you look at it from the right perspective. This is a difference to Windows CVEs.

    Of course this is great for those CVEs database providers because they now can sell their stuff happily.

    What you need are not CVE entries for the Linux Kernel, but the latest supported Linux Kernel installed.

    And srsly: Antivirus is snake oil. Using software with Administrator rights in Windows or even Linux, which parses every file, is fucking dangerous. It is usable on a mailserver, where the antivirus process is containerised or virtualized.

    And what is the point with firewalls I read here? The most distros have firewalls enabled. When were they not there? Iptables was always there and I had to configure it, so I could allow or disallow incoming traffic. I almost never had to install it manually.

    Edit:

    Regarding CVEs, here the what Linux CNA tells:

    Note, due to the layer at which the Linux kernel is in a system, almost any bug might be exploitable to compromise the security of the kernel, but the possibility of exploitation is often not evident when the bug is fixed. Because of this, the CVE assignment team is overly cautious and assign CVE numbers to any bugfix that they identify. This explains the seemingly large number of CVEs that are issued by the Linux kernel team.

    Source

    Any bugfix is a CVE