Thesis: The executive branch is becoming too powerful.
Antithesis: If that ever happened, the white-collar desk jockeys at the IRS would rise in revolt against authoritarianism.
Synthesis: Democracies cannot be authoritarian as long as they pass the 
test.
It's wild how "American laws are literally magical binding principles carved into the ontology of existence" is a terrifyingly mainstream position. It's like the moderate version of sovereign citizen brain.
The american constitution cannot be modified because it’s a god given set of rules and mandates. Whereas other countries’ constitutions simply give permissions to citizens
American nationalism is primarily religious in nature
I find it interesting how western academics will justifiably point out similarities between political movements and religions without ever considering that maybe religions were essentially how politics were done in the past