I didn't read the article but I did scan it and I saw this...
Oil and gas companies lobbied for the direct air capture money to be included in the law, arguing that the world could continue to burn fossil fuels if it had a way to clean up their planet-warming pollution.
Then why are we arguing?
I made a comment saying people are presenting these solutions as if they'll solve climate change and you made an analogy about drug use?
You know what analogy means?
yes, and I pointed out why it doesn't work already