It's no surprise Briahna doesn't get that voting in a bourgeois election is a purely consumer-level, symbolic act considering what she was doing this year and last. You think she would get it the most given how hard her campaign was fucked over and how easily the electorate was pied piper'd to the Biden campaign by Obama and the DNC elite - even the people at who could be said to participating at the highest level (besides actually running for office) are screwed over and their votes discounted.
Elections are an endless shell game from top to bottom and the level that people actually participate in them is minuscule. The people who actually vote are barely 55% of the electorate, primary voters are even rarer, people that donate to a primary campaign or volunteer are unicorns. Briahna is confusing her own and her friends relationship to elections (and the twitterati in general), but the data is in - most people don't engage with voting because they correctly recognize how little it has to do with their lives.
Briahna and the politcally motivated class could be said to have a "collective" characteristic to their vote, but almost everyone who votes is doing so at the individual level (because they don't participate in campaigns or primaries and only passively consume info at best). There are no organizations that could actually move the vote one way or the other because all of our social bonds have been dissolved by neoliberialism (Briahna countered this by saying she isn't personally a neoliberal, which ironically proves the point that social bonds have been dissolved - but as neoliberalism operates at the societal level and not the individual). Endorsements don't matter anymore, no one is suborned to a democratic centralist org, working people lack mass class consciousness.
The closest to a collective vote we have are these shadows on the walls of plato's cave. An actual collective vote would require mass participation and mass awareness of class position and mass suborning to a centralist org.
It's no surprise Briahna doesn't get that voting in a bourgeois election is a purely consumer-level, symbolic act considering what she was doing this year and last. You think she would get it the most given how hard her campaign was fucked over and how easily the electorate was pied piper'd to the Biden campaign by Obama and the DNC elite - even the people at who could be said to participating at the highest level (besides actually running for office) are screwed over and their votes discounted.
Elections are an endless shell game from top to bottom and the level that people actually participate in them is minuscule. The people who actually vote are barely 55% of the electorate, primary voters are even rarer, people that donate to a primary campaign or volunteer are unicorns. Briahna is confusing her own and her friends relationship to elections (and the twitterati in general), but the data is in - most people don't engage with voting because they correctly recognize how little it has to do with their lives.
Briahna and the politcally motivated class could be said to have a "collective" characteristic to their vote, but almost everyone who votes is doing so at the individual level (because they don't participate in campaigns or primaries and only passively consume info at best). There are no organizations that could actually move the vote one way or the other because all of our social bonds have been dissolved by neoliberialism (Briahna countered this by saying she isn't personally a neoliberal, which ironically proves the point that social bonds have been dissolved - but as neoliberalism operates at the societal level and not the individual). Endorsements don't matter anymore, no one is suborned to a democratic centralist org, working people lack mass class consciousness.
The closest to a collective vote we have are these shadows on the walls of plato's cave. An actual collective vote would require mass participation and mass awareness of class position and mass suborning to a centralist org.