• GarbageShoot [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    The PRC has the same three branches of government, including a President at the head of the executive branch, and a constitution that lays out their roles (more thoroughly than the US does the power of the judiciary), and it also holds direct elections for municipal offices. Neither country directly elects its President, as the PRC has elected officials vote and the US has the Electoral College say "just trust me bro" before giving the election to the other guy half the time (based on elections this century).

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      ·
      1 year ago

      We can see how the electoral college votes, just as we can see that China's elections are a sham. Loyalty to Xi is the only thing that matters in Chinese politics now.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We can see how the electoral college votes, hence why I wasn't worried about asserting that it just hands the votes to the other guy half the time, because if you are going to have a popular vote anyway, there's not much cause to just tip the scales in the direction of land owners unless you were against democracy.

        Have you ever made the slightest effort to investigate China's elections? Or do you just believe what the western press tells you about them? There's that saying that there is no need to burn books if you can just persuade people not to read them and we have here a demonstration why.

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          ·
          1 year ago

          The electoral college is one of the flaws I would like to see fixed. We should abolish the electoral college. It disproportionally benefits Republicans because they control more land, as you said. Representative democracy is supposed to represent the majority of people not a minority.

          I read a variety of what the free press has to offer about China. Xi has clearly consolidated power around him. It's not a secret.

          • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            free press

            A press thats 100% controlled by the capitalist class and expresses their interests cannot reasonably be described as free.

              • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Non-profit does not mean its not run by capitalist interest

                While the Sandler Foundation provided ProPublica with significant financial support, it also has received funding from the Knight Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Pew Charitable Trusts, Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, and the Atlantic Philanthropies.

                Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation

                  • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Can't find anything about funding right now, and I'm tired. But I do know they routinely publish articles inconsistent with the values of their namesake.

                    But I need to go to bed. Ive been doing this all day.

                    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      I don't see why you feel the need to be so picky. Any story can be cross referenced from multiple sources. Regardless, we can always argue later. Please get sleep. =)