Unsurprisingly over on
you had dork gamers decrying the developer for denying the profits to the IP owner. Like literally arguing that the game would not have been made if publisher has not provided funding... But like it definitely wouldn't have been made if the developer hadn't made it. Some people are so far gone.Infinite labor theory of value indoctrination on the G@mer class.
I'm going to make the chapter one of the capital into a game. And then put some big boobs on it to trick the gamers into playing
Amazing game. Only complaint is I wish it were longer, which isn't much of a complaint.
That and the difficulty curve is a bit steep sometimes cuz it gets really hard like halfway through lol
It's fun, basically like an old tony hawk game but also a third person shooter with a bullet time mechanic that you replenish by doing tricks
I'm not good enough to beat the game but it definitely a good un
The story was pretty based too from what I remember
I played the first two levels and kind of fell off of it. It looks cool but it didn't grab me.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
It REALLY sucks to hear someone who was a part of making of a thing is in no way benefiting from the purchase of a thing. Sure there are free games and FOSS and stuff, but it really just sucks to think everything is gig-work or contractors or whatever. If your name in the credits of a thing, you should get some of the coin from when people buy it. Also we shouldn't try to push people out of credits of the creation of things which happens all the time sadly.
