John Maclean, born on this day in 1879, was a Scottish schoolteacher and revolutionary Marxist, sometimes referred to as "Scotland's Lenin". His Marxist evening-classes produced many of the activists who became instrumental in the Clyde revolts during and after WWI. MacLean was appointed both an Honorary President of the first Congress of Soviets and Soviet Consul to Scotland in recognition of his consistent socialist position on the imperialist war and his tireless work in support of the Bolshevik revolution.

Maclean's revolutionary politics were well-known, and in 1915, he was arrested under the Defence of the Realm Act and fired from his job as a primary school teacher. As a consequence, he became a full-time Marxist lecturer and organizer, educating other Glaswegian workers in Marxist theory.

Maclean supported Irish independence on an anti-imperialist basis, describing the Irish War of Independence as "The Irish fight for freedom" and even condoning the assassination of a magistrate, Alan Bell. He saw the war in Ireland as strengthening the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, arguing that "Irish Sinn Féiners, who make no profession of socialism or communism...are doing more to help Russia and the revolution than all we professed Marxian Bolsheviks in Britain".

MacLean was at odds with much of the British left and dismissive of the newly-formed Communist Party of Great Britain. He had already turned his back on economism and the syndicalism favoured by the Clyde Workers’ Committee, had recognised the nature of British imperialism and come to the conclusion that revolution could only come about through the destruction of the British Empire.

Maclean was also noted for his outspoken opposition to World War I, and, in 1918, he was arrested for sedition. During the trial, Maclean gave the now legendary "speech from the dock", expounding on his position. He was sentenced to five years' penal servitude, but was released after the November armistice.

In captivity, Maclean had been on hunger strike, and prolonged force-feeding had permanently affected his health. He collapsed during a speech and died of pneumonia, aged forty-four.

"I have taken up unconstitutional action at this time because of the abnormal circumstances and because precedent has been given by the British government. I am a socialist, and have been fighting and will fight for an absolute reconstruction of society for the benefit of all. I am proud of my conduct. I have squared my conduct with my intellect, and if everyone had done so this war would not have taken place...

...I appeal exclusively to [the working class] because they and they only can bring about the time when the whole world will be in one brotherhood, on a sound economic foundation. That, and that alone, can be the means of bringing about a re-organisation of society. That can only be obtained when the people of the world get the world, and retain the world." -

--John MacLean, from the "Dock Speech"

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • SoylentSnake [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    1 month ago
    softboy/loverboy musings, break up posting

    i'm pretty functional following this most recent romantic loss vs past ones, even though it was a better connection than most of them. i guess i'm used to how this feels now. but i'm still hurting and it sucks how few people feel emotionally safe to go to to talk about the wounds i'm still healing from and the thoughts i'm still having. i'm realizing that most people are pretty dogshit at talking about romantic grief and break ups. there's a strong cultural push toward immediately jumping to invalidation & minimization ("plenty of fish," "just move on," "just forget them," "you'll find love again/you'll meet someone else" (this last one is less bad but still misses the mark imo)).

    i'm not sure why we're so averse to letting people feel healthy sadness around the fact that this specific connection and person is gone from one's life. letting those feelings rock is how you eventually process them and move on at a pace that's healthy for you. maybe other people just naturally have a more detached/transactional relationship to romance than i do? when i attach at this level people really get etched into my heart. maybe because i rarely connect deeply enough to see love potential at that level - it's happened maybe 3.5 times in my real adult life, so in the span of a decade+, and one of those people was my long-term partner. i'm also haunted by a lot of friends who have fallen out of my life longer than most seem to be. i can't help but feel there's a gendered dynamic at play also. like mascs are expected to be more stoic and "rational" through shit like this and on average women provide a lot more space for each others feelings of grief and vulnerability in this arena.

    in practice this just means i'm talking about it less than i usually do with the people in my life, like being more shallowly stoic about it. not out of some stiff upper lip bullshit, but more because i just know a lot of people in my life will only make me feel worse and it's a way of guarding my heart. my own journal is a much better place to talk these feelings through than with a lot of the actual human beings i'm close with.