The two astronauts will remain on the ISS until February 2025, when they'll return with two astronauts on the SpaceX Crew-9 mission that's arriving at the ISS next month.

  • FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]
    ·
    26 days ago

    anakin-padme-1 Our spacecraft is called the Starliner

    anakin-padme-2 Because it will transport us to the stars, right?

    anakin-padme-3 No. Because it's going to be a huge fireball in space

    anakin-padme-4

  • buh [she/her]
    ·
    26 days ago

    this will somehow be good for Boeing stock

    • someone [comrade/them, they/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      26 days ago

      I'd actually bet on Boeing stock going up if/when they cancel the Starliner program. It means one less guaranteed money-pit on the books.

        • someone [comrade/them, they/them]
          hexagon
          ·
          26 days ago

          That's why it was so satisfying to hear all the NASA officials in the press conference be confident that Starliner would fly in the future. Those remarks weren't some sort of praise for Boeing. Those remarks were NASA's way of telling Boeing to live up to the fixed-price contract, or else lawyers will get involved.

        • Runcible [none/use name]
          ·
          26 days ago

          they shit the bed incredibly badly and from what I understand everyone in industry is just rolling with it to claim this is why fixed price contracts aren't feasible

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    ·
    26 days ago

    If it lands on earth without problems, Boeing will claim that it had been maligned all along. If it blows up on reentry, Boeing will claim that NASA made them leave it parked in space much longer than designed.

    Best option is if it 'accidentally' veers toward Mars and sends back a ton of useful telemetry.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        There's a Lloyd Bridges movie from the 60s where a rocket mission to the moon accidentally lands on Mars instead, so surprisingly that it bewilders the astronauts as it happens and it looks like Mars is, like, just a little past the moon. It's pretty awful, and has roughly the same "le feeemale go back to the kitchen" preaching that a modern Chris Pratt Jurassic movie has, but I couldn't help thinking of it now.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            Naw, it's a shot in the arm when 2009Trek is so powered by the navigational force known as Destiny(tm) that a supernova threatens to blow up the entire galaxy/universe at a speed many times the speed of light (also known as speed of plot) unless Red Matter(tm)(r) can make a black hole to sort of kind of stop it. Also, moons with enough gravity to walk on and atmosphere to breathe are so tiny that it's super easy, barely an inconvenience, to get banished to one after a slapfight and, wherever you land, still be within sprinting distance of Leonard Nimoy's shelter. morshupls

          • someone [comrade/them, they/them]
            hexagon
            ·
            25 days ago

            No joke! I was a lifelong classic sci-fi literature fan, the stuff that Clarke and his contemporaries were writing. But it wasn't until I played KSP that I really understood the basics of spaceflight.