• Antikythera@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    You're not wrong, but just because the USA and UK got away with it doesn't mean we should continue to let others get away with it. We can't go back in time and fix it but we've got to start somewhere.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you even manage in a fever dream to think that this would set a precedent that would result in the US ever getting punished?

      • TheMage@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        Punished for what? Throwing money and military support towards everyone when they need it? Oh, that. Right. As always, hating the USA is what the cool kids do these days. Until they need taxpayer money or military support. I’d love to see us cut off every ounce of support we give to other nations and see how that works out.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d love to see us cut off every ounce of support we give to other nations and see how that works out.

          Me too! It would be an incredible turn of events that would massively benefit the world. Could you throw in removing the blockades on Cuba and the DPRK and others while you are at it?

        • camaron30 [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          COOL. GO AHEAD.

          Lmao, the US, simultaneously the strongest and coolest country in the world and a cucked nation that can be bullied by even the smallest african country into giving away free protection.

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          What support do you think you give? The "support" you give is either A) The cost of running your own propaganda, and paying target-nation actors. B) Weapons you buy from your own capitalists. C) Bribes in exchange for target-nation puppets to exploit their own people for the benefit of your capitalists. There is no fourth category.

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        "Not arresting this black man for possession of 0.01 grams of weed isn't going to go back in time and punish all those white guys we let go despite possessing much more weed. Cuff him, boys."

      • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Russia competes with neutral flags because they can't stop doping. It has nothing to do with us vs them. They literally can't stop cheating.

            • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Common sense?

              Have you played sports before? Even at the high school level teenagers are pumping their body full of steriods. I saw them do it myself, I've heard the stories from my friends who played rugby. Just look at top high school rugby or american football teams physiques, or at the cardio capacity of teenage track and field athletes. You really think that level is attainable without performance enhancing drugs, at such a widespread level? You really think that stops once these athletes become adults? How about the fact that all of Usain Bolt's competition got caught doping? You can't be this gullible. Seriously, read the article I've linked below.

              https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/bernstein-usain-bolt-is-probably-doping-and-you-know-it/

              Russia's sin here was official state involvement, not doping. As long as you pass the drug tests, nothing matters. Remember that Lance Armstrong never failed a drug test. Does that mean he's a clean athlete? Of course not, and neither was any of his competition. The same applies to the Olympics, the same applies to almost all competitive sports.

              • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
                ·
                1 year ago

                So no proof? That's what I figured.

                I did play sports. None of us took anything.

                    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      I'm going to assume you follow one or both, and that you're aware of the high prevalence of PEDs in both.

                      Now how are Olympic sports different than those leagues? Is there less of an incentive to cheat? Is the IOC more interested in preventing cheating? Do the athletes not care as much?

                      If anything, there is likely more doping in the Olympics because you have the resources of state actors backing athletes, see, e.g., Russia.

                      • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        I'm not the jackass who claimed every Olympian is doping. You guys are pathetic when trying to justify hyperbole. Lol

                        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          So you understand it's hyperbole but still take it literally just to argue? Take that shit back to reddit

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_doping_cases_in_cycling

              There is nothing that makes cycling significantly different from any other sport in terms of the advantages of doping, the testing for it, or the means of evasion.

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why make such a stupid comment? "Oh you mean literally every athlete is doping, well show me the piss of literally every athlete ever, oh that's impossible? Fucking rekt"

                  smuglord

                  • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You should be directing that comment to the dingus who literally claimed every athlete is doping in response to me. Try reading previous comments before acting like a dipshit while deep in the thread. Lol

                    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      the dingus who literally claimed every athlete

                      He didn't. That's not how language works and you know it -- you told me you knew it was hyperbole in another comment! Maybe try and have a conversation instead of this pedantic 🤓 "ummm ACKSHUALLY your statement is not LITERALLY 100% correct and backed up by six sources of my liking" garbage.

        • RuthlessCriticism [comrade/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          The United States are the GOATs of state sponsored and planned doping at the Olympics. Many of the involved doctors have talked about it in the decades since the '84 Olympics.

    • StalinwasaGryffindor [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are we letting the people responsible for Iraq and Afghanistans current state get away with it? Like if the US wants to arrest a war criminal Bush and Cheney are right there. Same for Blair, or Harper, or any of the other architects of the invasions.

      • Antikythera@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        I'm not saying they should get away with it, I'm just saying that we shouldn't let Russia get away with it because the United States and the UK got away with it. It's like the Boomer argument that it's not fair to them for student loans to be forgiven because they had to pay.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would you support a policy of student loan forgiveness for only white people?

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you not understand why I said that? I would not support student loan forgiveness only for white people because, while I like student loan forgiveness, I can recognize that such a program would ultimately just be in the interest of white supremacy. I wouldn't pull the disingenuous liberal line of "you've gotta start somewhere" as though the policy was tethered to some imaginary future state that it is nominally more similar to but practically much further from.

              Likewise, saying "well, at least by holding Belarus to account some countries will be held to account, which gets us closer to all countries being held to account!" is absurd. It promotes western dominance, not the abstract idea of "holding countries to account". Striking only one side saying that it's closer to both sides being struck than striking zero sides would be is sophistry.

        • StalinwasaGryffindor [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure where in the world you live, but for myself, I’m in a western country. It would be far more easy for my country to hold the architects of the Afghanistan invasion to account than Putin. The fact that my government doesn’t indicates that all the talk of punishing Russia has nothing to do with punishing aggression, it’s just about punishing a rival

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          You're trying to say by implication that the ship has sailed on Bush and Obama, but they're still alive. The USA Olympics team is still around. Even if you should've banned them in 1890 doesn't mean you still can't. They haven't apologised, paid reparations, or ceased any of their human rights violating projects.

      • PerCarita@discuss.tchncs.de
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why are we letting China get away with it? Why are we letting Saudi Arabia get away with it? The IOC is a toaster and it's like you're asking it to make you a whole roast dinner. It can't even make toast properly...

        • StalinwasaGryffindor [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not asking for anything, I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy in calling for punishing Russia for war crimes when in every respect the US and her vassals have committed and are committing orders of magnitude more violence in the last couple decades

          • PerCarita@discuss.tchncs.de
            ·
            1 year ago

            *his. Come on, the US is not a motherland, it's a fatherland.

            This is spiraling into whataboutism and I'm disengaging. Have a nice day!

        • Historical_General@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          You realise by targetting an official enemy state of the most powerful of the lot, we're essentially rewarding them? And making them more powerful on the world stage? So a fixation on CN and RU is inherently going to become counter-productive to goals of stability and human development etc.

    • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      "Just because we let the world's most prolific serial killer get away with it doesnt mean he shouldnt be allowed to keep murdering if he pinky swears his victims really deserve it this time."

      We can't go back in time and fix it but we've got to start somewhere.

      We are in total agreement here, and we can start by seizing the levers of power, purging the government of capitalists, withdrawing all troops from everywhere and using them for reforestation work, dismantling the IMF, paying reparations to every country we've victimized, and putting every fossil fuel executive and lobbyist against the wall for their omnicidal crimes against all terrestrial life.

    • space_comrade [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      but we've got to start somewhere.

      Somehow we always seem to be starting with US geopolitical enemies, never the US itself, despite literal centuries of heinous crimes.

      Curious how that works.