• aleph@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, so you're saying that Russia illegally annexing Crimea in 2014 wasn't an invasion of Ukraine?

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can always tell who the most ignorant libs are when they bring up Crimea lmao

        Crimea is not Ukrainian, it has always been a distinct cultural ethnic region and 97% of Crimeans voting for independence from Kiev should give you pause before you breathlessly insist they should remain beholden to a bunch of nazi banderites

        • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          "Acktually sweaty, don't you know that if a vote has a higher than 80% yes vote, it's automatically a sham? Every vote needs to be really close or else it doesn't count and isn't real democracy. Consensus isn't democratic!"

        • aleph@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          Crimeans wanting independence means they wanted to become part of the Russian empire again?

          • Tachanka [comrade/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            the Russian federation is a reactionary bourgeois state that is a hollowed out shell of its former USSR self, but I dislike the hyperbole that it is "the Russian Empire". Russia Today is neither the Russian empire, nor the Soviet Union. If anything it is closer politically to what it would have been if the February revolution had continued and the October revolution never happened: A bourgeois state.

          • Redcat [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            a russian majority region would rather not be ethnically cleansed

            they join russia

            those people are pro russian empire traitors

            yea

          • CyborgMarx [any, any]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes you dumb fuck, as a means of protection from the nazi captured Ukrainian army who would've otherwise bulldozed the small region

      • emizeko [they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        making it pretty obvious here that you have no idea who Victoria Nuland is and only started paying attention to any of this stuff in 2022

        • aleph@lemm.ee
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh, I've been following the whole thing for years and know who she is.

          I just don't think that her supporting pro-democratic and anti-corruption reform in Ukraine equates to it being okay for Russia to annex part of a neighbouring country.

            • jackmarxist [any]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Liberal Democracy is all about giving Americans the right to vote in your countries elections.

          • emizeko [they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            pro-democratic

            democracy is when you pick the new officials yourself on a phone call with Geoffrey Pyatt

          • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Pro-democracy is when you ban left opposition but not fascists. Anti-corruption is when you have offshore accounts connected to the oligarch who funded said fascists that you used to work for on his TV program

              • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                The Pandora Papers revealed that Zelensky and his inner circle had offshore accounts connected to Kolomoisky. Kolomoisky is an oligarch that owned the TV station Zelensky worked for prior. He also funded nazi militias that couped the government in 2014

          • emizeko [they/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            supporting pro-democratic and anti-corruption reform in Ukraine

            [laughs in Operation Aerodynamic]

          • Redcat [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            democracy is when you elect zelensky on a platform of peace with russia but he lets the Right Sector and Azov continue to try the ethnic cleansing of eastern ukraine

          • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just don't think that her supporting pro-democratic and anti-corruption reform

            Is this a joke? Pro democracy? Anti corruption? When has the US ever stood for that outside of propaganda purposes?

      • robinn2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • aleph@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          Assuming that it was even legitimate to begin with, which is a big if, a popular vote doesn't automatically legitimize relinquishing territory to a foreign nation.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Assuming that it was even legitimate to begin with

            "Democracy is when the stupid foreigners vote how I think they should, otherwise it's not legitimate"

            doesn't automatically legitimize relinquishing territory to a foreign nation.

            If the people vote overwhelmingly to leave Ukraine, then that shows that Crimea isn't Ukraine's to relinquish or not. Liberals and abandoning democracy as soon as it becomes a rhetorical inconvenience for them, name a more iconic duo.

          • footfaults [none/use name]
            ·
            1 year ago

            plebecites that don't go my way are automatically illegitimate

            Oh look another imperialist

          • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]
            ·
            1 year ago

            a "popular vote" doesn't automatically legitimize relinquishing territory to a foreign nation.

            Good you acknowledge that even the westoid cope for the Euromaidan coup is bullshit.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            If your aim is to prevent war, what is your solution for when the vast majority of people in one country want to join another, and vote accordingly?

            • aleph@lemm.ee
              ·
              1 year ago

              A complicated situation certainly, but whatever the answer is, it is not "collude with a neighbouring foreign nation, allow them to invade, and provoke a military conflict."

              • footfaults [none/use name]
                ·
                1 year ago

                a complicated situation

                proceeds to construct the most disingenuous and untrue summary of the situation

                smuglord

              • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                So you don't have an answer, but "a vote followed by annexation" is unacceptable for some reason? Why reject a peaceful solution that results in people having the government they want to live under?

              • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Apparently it's "collude with local fascists and US MIC and allow them to provoke a military conflict and wage a proxy war with Russia"

                Pretty extreme answer for a situation you consider to be "complicated"

          • Redcat [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            territorial integrity takes precedence over popular will

            we agree taiwan isn't a country then

            • robinn2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • Redcat [he/him]
                ·
                1 year ago

                sounds like someone hasn't asked my friends in the Taiwanese Liberation Subreddit what their opinions are!

      • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know borders are sacred and inviolable, but Ukraine and Russia were part of the same country until fairly recently. It's not weird that large populations of people would rather not be living under the rule of Ukrainian nationalists and decided to make some adjustments.