• Sinister [none/use name, comrade/them]B
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hawaii is a victim of colonialism to this day. The sovereignty of hawaii was illegally stolen. Every day natives of hawaii are priced out of their own homes by their alleged fellow citizens. A genocide beneath the very fingers that so like to point towards other nations.

    • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US is still bitter that Hawaii was more advanced than the United States of Backwards way back when.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be up to the people who live there to figure out how to run things. This is certainly not an argument for US to continue occupying them.

      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        how is it an “occupation” when Hawaiians themselves voted to become a state by a 94+% majority?

        On June 27, 1959, a referendum asked residents of Hawaiʻi to vote on the statehood bill; 94.3% voted in favor of statehood and 5.7% opposed it. (source)

        • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          If voting "yes" on a referendum to be annexed is an accurate way of knowing that the majority of the populace supports annexation, does the same logic apply to Crimea being annexed by Russia? If not, why not?

          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            If voting “yes” on a referendum to be annexed

            inventing some history again are you? because this never happened. if you have to stoop this low to try to “score points” how much lower will you stoop?

            • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you don't have an argument and have to make shit up. Cool. Judging by your other responses in the thread, you're a shill trying to astroturf support for the U.S., so Imma block you 💅

              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                ·
                1 year ago

                So you don’t have an argument and have to make shit up.

                “I know you are but what am I?” is not a convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

                Judging by your other responses in the thread, you’re a shill trying to astroturf support for the U.S., so Imma block you 💅

                nah, just argue the facts, which I provide. you don’t like it and hurl childish insults in response. blocking me is doing ME a favor. bye!

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              this never happened

              Uhhh https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/03/16/290525623/crimeans-vote-on-splitting-from-ukraine-to-join-russia

              The referendum had widely been expected to pass; Crimea's parliament has already voted to seek annexation by Russia...

              Update at 3 p.m. ET: The Polls Are Closed; 93 Percent Approval Cited

              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Uhhh https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/03/16/290525623/crimeans-vote-on-splitting-from-ukraine-to-join-russia

                there’s moving the goalposts, then there’s moving them 55 years into the future and to the other side of the planet.

                We’re taking about Hawaii here. you’re so lost and hate the US and “The West™®©” so much that you think this is one of your Ukaine/Russia arguments. WOW….

                Show

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago
                  1. You said "[a yes vote on Russia annexing Crimea] never happened."
                  2. I showed that it did.
                  3. You responded with "We’re taking about Hawaii here."

                  Get the fuck out of here

                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You said “[a yes vote on Russia annexing Crimea] never happened.”

                    YOU said that. keep your words out of my mouth.

                    I showed that it did.

                    you know everyone can see your comments and my comments, right? that is very much not what happened, as anyone with eyeballs can see. I’m sorry that you’re having trouble seeing reality. consult a physician.

                    You responded with “We’re taking about Hawaii here.”

                    because we are, despite your attempts to change the subject. are you lost again?

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          from your own link

          In 1897, over 21,000 Natives, representing the overwhelming majority of adult Hawaiians, signed anti-annexation petitions in one of the first examples of protest against the overthrow of Queen Liliʻuokalaniʻs government.[143] Nearly 100 years later, in 1993, 17,000 Hawaiians marched to demand access and control over Hawaiian trust lands and as part of the modern Hawaiian sovereignty movement.[144] Hawaiian trust land ownership and use is still widely contested as a consequence of annexation. According to scholar Winona LaDuke, as of 2015, 95% of Hawaiʻiʻs land was owned or controlled by just 82 landholders, including over 50% by federal and state governments, as well as the established sugar and pineapple companies.[144] The Thirty Meter Telescope is planned to be built on Hawaiian trust land, but has faced resistance as the project interferes with Kanaka indigeneity.[clarify][145]

          If you think a referendum from 1959 fairly represents the interests of the native population then what else is there to say.

          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you think a referendum from 1959 fairly represents the interests of the native population then what else is there to say.

            that it does, and you have failed to prove otherwise despite quoting a block f text you clearly don’t understand— OR are intentionally misrepresenting, hoping everyone else here is too stupid to realize you’re trying to pull a fast one on them.

            Fortunately, I’m not the idiot you think I am.

              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                A referendum to either become a state or remain a territory is not relevant to the question of the occupation.

                only because you’ve moved the goalposts when you couldn’t win that argument with facts.

                People were never given a choice of independence

                Show

                the people always ave that choice. they can protest, revolt, etc. Did the Bolsheviks just ask the Tsars to pretty please step aside?

                Seems that you’re intentionally arguing in bad faith here.

                I’m not the one ignoring facts, employing logical fallacies and hurling personal insults when I don’t “win” online arguments.

                Clearly you’re a much bigger idiot than I thought you were.

                can’t argue with facts, so playskool insults it is. classy. no wonder I see he molding full of you getting posts and comments removed, and you’re totally banned form lemmy.world.

                also explains this post https://lemmy.ml/post/2756876

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                  hexagon
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  only because you’ve moved the goalposts when you couldn’t win that argument with facts.

                  I didn't move any goal posts. I said Hawaii is an occupied territory, and you came back with BuT ThEy HaD a RefErEnduM. Forgetting to mention that the referendum wasn't actually about independence and that the people of Hawaii were never given a choice of independence by their occupiers.

                  There is no false dichotomy here. It's hilarious seeing your comment history where you communicate through memes like a 5 year old child.

                  the people always ave that choice. they can protest, revolt, etc. Did the Bolsheviks just ask the Tsars to pretty please step aside?

                  People in Hawaii are revolting against your regime as we speak.

                  The facts are that you made false claim and now you don't even have the decency to admit it. No point having further discussion with a liar.

                  also explains this post https://lemmy.ml/post/2756876

                  love living rent free in your collective heads

                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I didn’t move any goal posts.

                    “nuh-uh!” isn’t a very convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

                    There is no false dichotomy here.

                    see my previous reply

                    People in Hawaii are revolting against your regime as we speak.

                    a handful of protesters is hardly a “revolt”, but you’re adorable for thinking “big”.

                    The facts are

                    the last thing you have is a grasp on the facts. your comment an post history are proof enough of that, with a long history of bans, deleted comments, and verbally being drummed you of most places you visit or being a toxic mess.

                    love living rent free in your collective heads

                    how sad for you

                    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                      hexagon
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      “nuh-uh!” isn’t a very convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

                      Do feel free to articulate which goal posts you're claiming that I moved. Be specific.

                      see my previous reply

                      I did, it's nonsensical.

                      a handful of protesters is hardly a “revolt”, but you’re adorable for thinking “big”.

                      Way to dismiss majority of the native population. I guess that's what you'd expect from racist occupiers.

                      the last thing you have is a grasp on the facts. your comment an post history are proof enough of that, with a long history of bans, deleted comments, and verbally being drummed you of most places you visit or being a toxic mess.

                      Wow interesting narrative you made up about me there. Maybe send me of whatever drugs you're having while hallucinating these things, cause that sounds like some good shit.

                      how sad for you

                      Nah, it's free entertainment for me kddio.

                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        1 year ago

                        Do feel free to articulate which goal posts you’re claiming that I moved. Be specific.

                        I already have, in detail. sealioning as you last line of attack? boring…

                        I did, it’s nonsensical.

                        I’m not responsible for your lack of comprehension.

                        Way to dismiss majority of the native population.

                        Show

                        Wow interesting narrative you made up about me there

                        anyone is free to look at your comment history or the modlogs. no drugs necessary. how like you to hurl insult - yet again - when confronted with facts you can’t refute.

                        Nah, it’s free entertainment for me kddio.

                        not very convincing….

                          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                            ·
                            edit-2
                            1 year ago

                            You have not done any such thing

                            “nuh-uh!” isn’t a very convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

                            but I guess lying is all you’ve been doing here

                            “I know you are but what am I?” isn’t a very convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

                                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                                  hexagon
                                  ·
                                  1 year ago

                                  You're literally defending why it's justified for US to occupy Hawaii in this thread colonizer. I'm very much entertained by you publicly debasing yourself here. Hope you made enough FICO score points to buy yourself food tonight.

                                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                    ·
                                    1 year ago

                                    You’re literally defending why it’s justified for US to occupy Hawaii in this thread colonizer

                                    I merely presented facts you didn’t like, so you’re lying about what I said (even though anyone can scroll up and see you’re lying and what I actually said) just because you have no argument other than to hurl insults.

                                    Show

                                    I’m very much entertained by you publicly debasing yourself here.

                                    then you’re experiencing hallucinations, as the facts don’t correspond to your experience.

                                    Hope you made enough FICO score points to buy yourself food tonight.

                                    whatever that means…. I buy food with money I earn from work.

                                    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                                      hexagon
                                      ·
                                      edit-2
                                      1 year ago

                                      If by presented facts you mean lied then sure.

                                      What you presented was a referendum that wasn't done exclusively amongst the indigenous population whose land your regime occupied, and that wasn't about independence at all.

                                      That's the only actual straw man in this thread.

                                      And now you just keep spamming here instead of admitting that you are a liar, but anybody can read this thread and see that you are full of shit.

                                      whatever that means…. I buy food with money I earn from work.

                                      at a troll farm

                                      🤡

                                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                        ·
                                        1 year ago

                                        If by presented facts you mean lied then sure.

                                        since, after multiple accusations, you STILL can’t show evidence of this without either putting words in my mouth or outright lying (which I point out every time, as the comments above prove), it’s a bit f a joke now when you say this.

                                        What you presented was a referendum that wasn’t done exclusively amongst the indigenous population whose land your regime occupied, and that wasn’t about independence at all.

                                        moving the goalposts doesn’t change the facts, which I have laid out and explained detail above already. repeating the same logical fallacies over and over won’t make them magically come true.

                                        And now you just keep spamming her

                                        if you don’t like it when I call out your repeated BS every time you reply with false accusations, childish insults, logical fallacies, and outright lies, then you cans top any time. facing the consequences of your actions is not a a state of victimhood.

                                        at a troll farm

                                        oh, I thought you loved Russians and the fine work they do!

                                        lmao

                                          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                            ·
                                            1 year ago

                                            lmao I love how you think that if you just keep repeating bullshit enough times it’ll be true, what an utter clown you are

                                            it’s interesting how simply hearing the facts repeated angers you so much, right to the point of tantrums and hurling insults. Hardly a position from which to argue that your is the reasonable point, or the factual one, especially since you have no facts.

                                  • TremblingTelepath@lemmy.ml
                                    ·
                                    1 year ago

                                    You'd think people would at least have the decency to keep their mouth shut right now.

                                    I mean Biden only offered them like $700. Who knows when they'll get that, if at all!

                    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      1 year ago

                      “nuh-uh!” isn’t a very convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

                      Amazing that @whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml, who is also a fan of those weird debate fallacy images, posted this in another thread today:

                      “nuh-uh” isn’t a convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

                      Also this, also from today:

                      “I know you are but what am I?” is not a convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

                      You also posted that second one, verbatim, this afternoon as @adroidBalloon@lemmy.ml.

                      You're the same person, aren't you?

                      Edit: Lol you even responded to an argument in this thread while still logged in to @whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml, then deleted it because someone noticed.

                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        it’s not amazing that I can copy and paste images I see in other comment threads. especially when they work well… I even say that’s what I did in several comments.

                        it’s sad that, rather than seeing that you’re wrong, you invent conspiracies, lmao. you’re not that important

                        • Rom [he/him]
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          No one's buying it, you know that, right?

                          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                            ·
                            1 year ago

                            No one’s buying it, you know that, right?

                            Whhaaaa??? you mean to say that a brigading band of angry trolls from two of the most toxic instances in the fediverse remain unconvinced by facts and logic??? GASP!!

                            • Rom [he/him]
                              ·
                              edit-2
                              1 year ago

                              No, I'm talking about the one angry troll pretending to be six different people who is being toxic in this thread.

                              That's you, since you seem to have trouble understanding things that aren't spelled out for you (or for that matter, things that are).

                              You're committing a strawman fallacy, or a false equivalence, or a false dichotomy, whatever, take your pick. You don't know the difference, anyway.

                              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                ·
                                edit-2
                                1 year ago

                                No, I’m talking about the one angry troll pretending to be six different people who is being toxic in this thread.

                                right, because the only way some could disagree with or object to a brigade of angry trolls from hexbear is because of some “conspiracy” you can’t prove.

                                lol

                                You’re committing a strawman fallacy, or a false equivalence, or a false dichotomy, whatever, take your pick. You don’t know the difference, anyway.

                                “I know you are but what am I?” doesn’t make a convincing argument. most people learn that when they’re 5.

                                • Rom [he/him]
                                  ·
                                  edit-2
                                  1 year ago

                                  No, you're right, it's much more likely that several different users are all doing the same "everything you say is a logical fallacy" shtick, using the exact same Philosophy 101 infographics for these alleged logical fallacies in their posts, all completely failing to understand the logical fallacies they're accusing others of committing, all using the same arguments verbatim, have all been active in the last five hours, all have comment scores that immediately shoot up to 7 after a few minutes, all have posts in the same Star Trek comm where one of the accounts just happens to be a mod, and are all acting like all around shithead trolls everywhere they go. Nope, clearly totally separate people, must be a conspiracy.

                                  Again, no one's buying it.

                                  Honestly I kind of pity you. How bad is your life that you have to sit here for hours on the internet with several different accounts just being a shithead everywhere and just keep arguing with people like a child? It's really pathetic. Get off the computer, go outside, go talk to people.

                                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                    ·
                                    1 year ago

                                    No, you’re right, it’s much more likely that several different users are all doing the same “everything you say is a logical fallacy” shtick, using the exact same Philosophy 101 infographics for these alleged logical fallacies in their posts,

                                    yeah, because google exists and copy/paste exist everywhere but on whatever planet you’re from. You guys should get on that.

                                    it’s been my experience that bullies like to blame others for the consequences they face rather then accept them.

                                    • Rom [he/him]
                                      ·
                                      edit-2
                                      1 year ago

                                      it’s been my experience that bullies like to blame others for the consequences they face rather then accept them.

                                      Is that why you're still denying all of your alts?

                                      Go ahead and take a few minutes to respond, I know you're engaged in several other discussions right now on your other accounts.

                                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                        ·
                                        1 year ago

                                        Is that why you’re still denying all of your alts?

                                        I’m very sorry for your troubles. just so you know, professional help is available in your area.

                                        best of luck with that

                                        • Rom [he/him]
                                          ·
                                          1 year ago

                                          Come on, you can do better than that. What happened to all your infographics about random fallacies? Those are hilarious.

                                          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                            ·
                                            edit-2
                                            1 year ago

                                            Come on, you can do better than that.

                                            you’re free to troll someone else. all your bottled up rage has to go somewhere, right? it’s not like you know how to deal with it in a healthy way, or you wouldn’t be here proving that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                                              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                                ·
                                                1 year ago

                                                lol, you’re funny.

                                                In me experience, and especially with those who’ve been accused of projection in the past, a really good tell of someone’s insecurity is the good ol’ “you’re projecting” line. see, it’s something a psychologist wouldn’t really be able to diagnose until they’d met and interviewed a person, but with online trolls and bullies, it’s a pretty easy tell that they, in fact, are the ones projecting.

                                                you’re pretty sloppy at trolling, and you give yourself away a lot. oh, and beyond wasting bth of our time, you really haven’t done anything but make yourself very upset. I’ve enjoyed serveral films.

                                                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                                    ·
                                                    1 year ago

                                                    Must be a coincidence

                                                    must be ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                                                    Anyway, what about your parents? Did your mother love you? From the way you’ve been behaving today, I’m starting to think she might not have been a part of your life. Do you need a hug?

                                                    you know that “projection” thing you were talking about? 😄

                                                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                                        ·
                                                        edit-2
                                                        1 year ago

                                                        your life must be pretty dull if all you can do is spend time imagining conspiracies against, you. and such boring conspiracies…

                                                        edit: I wonder… if you told someone your little theory, do you think they’d think you were making it up, or just shocked at how pathetic it was you gave a crap?"

                                                          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                                            ·
                                                            1 year ago

                                                            You’re the one calling them conspiracies

                                                            because I know what th word means. don’t fear knowledge, kid. knowledge is super!

                                                            I’m just making deductions based on observations, that’s all.

                                                            jumping straight tp paranoid conspiracy rather than considering that your trolling is unpopular isn’t what most would consider rational.

                                                            It’s okay if you don’t want to talk about your dad, it’s not your fault he wasn’t around when you were a child. What about the other kids in school? Did they bully you a lot? I’m getting a real “bullied as a child” impression from you, the way you keep lashing out on the internet like this.

                                                            I’m sorry that you really want to talk about your dad, but I’m not your therapist.

                                                              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                                                ·
                                                                edit-2
                                                                1 year ago

                                                                This one is just you.

                                                                then I suppose “paranoid delusion” is more appropriate.

                                                                Do you remember when he left you? Did he ever lay his hands on you or your mother? Other siblings? Remember, it’s not your fault he hit you. You’re not a bad person.

                                                                I’m sorry to hear of your troubled childhood

                                                                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                                                    ·
                                                                    edit-2
                                                                    1 year ago

                                                                    Well, this has been fun.

                                                                    kinda supports my argument that you’re a troll if this is your idea of fun.

                                                                    but I’ve wasted too much time on this conversation already, and I’d rather be spending it doing literally anything else.

                                                                    [X] DOUBT

                                                                    if that were true, you wouldn't have spent hours here trying to convince me of the weird things going on in your head.

                                                                    In all seriousness though, I do hope you seek therapy. This level of toxic internet behavior really isn’t healthy.

                                                                    at last, some self-reflection, even if it’s reflecting off of me…. (ya know, that projection thing you mentioned earlier…) also, best of luck with your dad!

                        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          How about you shut the fuck up, on however many accounts you're running

        • ikilledtheradiostar [comrade/them, love/loves]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The choice was to become a state or remain a territory. Either yes or no would have had Hawaiian peoples occupied. Statehood could be seen as a regaining a scrap of self determination but all it ended up doing was impoverishing the natives and ceding all wealth to colonizing capitalists. This is a primarily function of bourgeois democracy.

          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            by voting to become a state - especially to such an overwhelming majority - you can hardly argue a dispositive attitude towards the US being there or towards joining the union. so, not only have you moved the goalposts, you’re arguing a straw man and your own emotions.

            I’m sticking with provable facts.

            • ikilledtheradiostar [comrade/them, love/loves]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Once again they were given a choice between becoming a state or remaining a territory. Not for independence. It'd be like offering a scrap of bread to a starving man in exchange for the man legitimizing your ability to keep him malnourished.

              The ole adage of "the only thing worse than being exploited is not being exploited " comes to mind.

              Since you can't be assed to read your own damn wiki article I assume you're just in bad faith.

              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                ·
                1 year ago

                Once again they were given a choice between becoming a state or remaining a territory

                Show

                Hawaiians could have protested, revolted, or one of many other options. But they didn’t.

                That’s the thing about facts— your opinions don’t magically make them untrue, regardless of how many folksy sayings or logical fallacies you conjure.

                • Kaputnik [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Like the Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement which began actively protesting and gained support in the 1960s, pretty soon after the referendum?

                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Like the Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement

                    sure. why not? people can object to or protest anything.

                    the fee expression of speech in a democratic forum, however, certainly argues against any of this being “fascist”, though. thanks of pointing this out!

                    • Kaputnik [he/him]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      So then your point about

                      Hawaiians could have protested, revolted, or one of many other options. But they didn’t.

                      Is false

                      So to quote you

                      That’s the thing about facts— your opinions don’t magically make them untrue, regardless of how many folksy sayings or logical fallacies you conjure.

                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        Is false

                        only if you intentionally take them out of context and twist the meaning. because they didn’t do that before the vote. as you said:

                        Like the Hawaiian Sovereignty Movement which began actively protesting and gained support in the 1960s, pretty soon after the referendum?

                        so, despite your obviously bad-faith and disingenuous argument, I’m not as stupid as you think I am. nice try.

                        That’s the thing about facts— your opinions don’t magically make them untrue, regardless of how many folksy sayings or logical fallacies you conjure. NOR how much you try to twist my words.

                        • Kaputnik [he/him]
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          Nice job replying on your other account first lol, are you in here upvoting yourself too?

                            • Kaputnik [he/him]
                              ·
                              1 year ago

                              I dunno what to tell you dawg if you can't understand that a referendum of Hawaiian residents from 1959 doesn't represent the opinions of Native Hawaiians after 60 years of American control and immigration to the island. If you're so into facts and stats you should know a representative measure of their opinion could only be done through a survey of Native Hawaiians

                              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                ·
                                edit-2
                                1 year ago

                                doesn’t represent the opinions of Native Hawaiians

                                1. that was never my argument
                                2. this is a straw man argument because you couldn’t argue agains the facts I initially stated and moved the goalposts from Hawaiian residents to Hawaiian natives
                                3. as such, it’s irrelevant

                                even if it were relevant then it isn’t now just because you’re angry about… whatever.

                                If you’re so into facts and stats you should know a representative measure of their opinion could only be done through a survey of Native Hawaiians

                                well, why don’t you do that and come back when YOU have some relevant facts to present, and we can talk again.

                                • Kaputnik [he/him]
                                  ·
                                  1 year ago

                                  Okay we're in a thread talking about how Native Hawaiians feel about the American government. I actually want to know why you are arguing this point and what you feel it accomplishes, in genuine good faith. Like are you Native Hawaiian, do you like in Hawaii, do you just like the idea of being able to visit Hawaii without a passport, or is there some other reason?

                                  For me, I'm arguing this because I believe Indigenous people around the world have a right to self governance and freedom from colonial occupiers. So what's your reason?

                                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                    ·
                                    edit-2
                                    1 year ago

                                    Okay we’re in a thread talking about how Native Hawaiians feel about the American government

                                    due to your amnesia, I’ll remind you that this is how it started:

                                    Show

                                    once the facts were presented, goalposts were moved to “native” Hawaiians because the argument couldn’t be “won" without that straw man, and I’ve been posting that out since.

                                    I actually want to know why you are arguing this point and what you feel it accomplishes, in genuine good faith.

                                    I doubt that, as I’ve made this clear many, many times, and you keep ignoring it.

                                    Like are you Native Hawaiian, do you like in Hawaii, do you just like the idea of being able to visit Hawaii without a passport, or is there some other reason?

                                    not only is my personal information irrelevant, I’d be pretty stupid to give someone like you any personal details that you’d very obviously weaponize against me at your first opportunity. as I’ve said before, I’m not as stupid as you think I am.

                                    For me, I’m arguing this because I believe Indigenous people around the world have a right to self governance and freedom from colonial occupiers. So what’s your reason?

                                    no, you’re here to “win” because you hate the US and think I’m your enemy. i've seen your comment history. I sonly presented facts and you and your cohorts don’t like the facts as they clash with your ideology, so you attack me rater than argue the facts rationally. It’s hostile, toxic bullying, and the mere suggestion that you’re interested in god-faith discussion outside of your own echo chamber is a joke.

                                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                        ·
                                        edit-2
                                        1 year ago

                                        Alright I tried doing this on your terms, peace

                                        if that were true, you would have argued honestly, with the facts, and in good faith. I have demonstrated, many, many time, how you have not. again, you lie to comfort yourself against facts you refuse to accept.

                                        best of luck with that.

                • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What if 90% of Hawaiians had revolted (and lost) while 90%+ of the other 10% of Hawaiians voted in the referendum?

                • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re the one reducing possibilities. Your dichotomy is between staying a territory and becoming a state. While being a state is nominally better than being outright occupied subjects, prior to colonization they were better off, and you suggest decolonization and not being colonized aren’t options.

                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You’re the one reducing possibilities. Your dichotomy is between staying a territory and becoming a state

                    I never made this argument, but several others here did. in fact, I, several times, pointed out that there were other possibilities.

                    clearly you’re confused.

        • CascadeOfLight [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Should I kill you with my sword or with my gun?

          Sorry, "I want to live" was not an option on the ballot shrug-outta-hecks

          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            sigh…

            Should I kill you with my sword or with my gun?

            Show

            Sorry, “I want to live” was not an option on the ballot

            Show

            • CascadeOfLight [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Referendum is literally: "Would you like to be a state or a territory? Independence is not an option."

              Sigh...

              • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                ·
                1 year ago

                False dichotomy is when you point out that people might want something other than two shit binary choices.

              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                ·
                1 year ago

                your lack of ability to imagine another option (such as revolt, etc.) does not mean you “win” the argument. it just means you lose because you lack imagination.

                • CascadeOfLight [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  YOUR ARGUMENT is that the result of this referendum matters. It doesn't because, as you've identified, both options are the same. As for Hawaiian resistance, they've been fighting continuously for a hundred years and, like every other liberation movement against the USA, have been ruthlessly suppressed by the fascist police and petty-bourgeoise militia of the "middle class". And, like every other liberation struggle, victory is inevitable as the empire continues to crumble beneath the weight of its sins.

                  Show

                  Also, neat how you've got five devoted followers upvoting you within two minutes on every one of your shitty empire-shilling posts for the last several hours thinkin-lenin

                  • Rom [he/him]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah I've seen at least two of this dork's alts posting the same dumb infographics of logical fallacies that they themselves are committing without a hint of irony.

                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    YOUR ARGUMENT is that the result of this referendum matters

                    The FACTS bear that out. you’re attacking me because I pointed that out.

                    It doesn’t because, as you’ve identified, both options are the same

                    I didn’t say that, you did. keep your words out of my mouth.

                    As for Hawaiian resistance, they’ve been fighting continuously for a hundred years and, like every other liberation movement against the USA, have been ruthlessly suppressed by the fascist police and petty-bourgeoise militia of the “middle class”.

                    relevant to the argument, and a

                    Show

                    you guys are addicted to logical fallacies

                    And, like every other liberation struggle, victory is inevitable as the empire continues to crumble beneath the weight of its sins.

                    cute story. also irrelevant

                    Also, neat how you’ve got five devoted followers upvoting you within two minutes on every one of your shitty empire-shilling posts for the last several hours

                    jealousy is an ugly look

        • Kuori [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overthrow_of_the_Hawaiian_Kingdom

          note the dates. it was forcibly annexed by a coup government. the later vote to join as a state took place well afterwards

          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            note the dates. it was forcibly annexed by a coup government

            the facts don’t support your assertions. even if they did, it’s irrelevant because….

            the later vote to join as a state took place well afterwards

            just as I said and the facts I gave support. since 94% of people voted to become a state, no rational person would call it an “occupation”.

      • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, just clarifying the best case scenario. Did the Hawaiian people recently vote to leave the union that I am unaware of?

          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            in 1959, with a 93%+ majority:

            Hawaii—a U.S. territory since 1898—became the 50th state in August, 1959, following a referendum in Hawaii in which more than 93% of the voters approved the proposition that the territory should be admitted as a state.

            There were many Hawaiian petitions for statehood during the first half of the 20th century. The voters wished to participate directly in electing their own governor and to have a full voice in national debates and elections that affected their lives. The voters also felt that statehood was warranted because they had demonstrated their loyalty—no matter what their ethnic background—to the U.S. to the fullest extent during World War II.

            (source)

            On June 27, 1959, a referendum asked residents of Hawaiʻi to vote on the statehood bill; 94.3% voted in favor of statehood and 5.7% opposed it. The referendum asked voters to choose between accepting the Act and remaining a U.S. territory. The United Nations' Special Committee on Decolonization later removed Hawaiʻi from its list of non-self-governing territories.

            (source)

            • WhatWouldKarlDo@lemmygrad.ml
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think it's more than a little dishonest to say that the native Hawaiians voted for this. At the time of this referendum, they composed about 15% of the population and their culture and identity had been suppressed for generations.

              The US government even admitted in 1993 that the native people never agreed to this.

              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I think it’s more than a little dishonest to say that the native Hawaiians voted for this.

                almost as dishonest as claiming is said something I didn’t and then moving the goalposts to win an argument…

                At the time of this referendum, they composed about 15% of the population and their culture and identity had been suppressed for generations.

                irrelevant. sad, but irrelevant. thy got to vote, just like anyone else, and, even by your numbers, 2/3 of THAT population voted for statehood.

                The US government even admitted in 1993 that the native people never agreed to this.

                that’s not what that says, but it’s nice to know how easy it is for you to lie to try to get ahead in an argument. “winning” online debates must be very important for you.

                • Sinister [none/use name, comrade/them]B
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Swarming lands with your settlers and then claiming b-but they muh voted for it, is peak lib cracker imperialism. The french did the same in New Caledonia.

                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Swarming lands with your settlers and then claiming b-but they muh voted for it, is peak lib cracker imperialism. The french did the same in New Caledonia.

                    so, when you can’t argue with facts, you rest to redefining words, personal insults, and racist slurs.

                    classy

                    • Sinister [none/use name, comrade/them]B
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      I didn’t argue with you, I made clear statements about your nature and your character. Its up to you to change that and if you refuse, well thats just proves me right in the end.

                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        I didn’t argue with you

                        yeah, that’s why I said “when you can’t argue…”

                        I made clear statements about your nature and your character

                        you had a tantrum and hurtled racist slurs and insults

                        well thats just proves me right in the end.

                        you’e right because you have racist tantrums and can’t make rational, fact-based arguments? interesting take...

              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                as you can clearly see,

                On June 27, 1959, a referendum asked residents of Hawaiʻi to vote on the statehood bill; 94.3% voted in favor of statehood and 5.7% opposed it.

                    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                      hexagon
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      The discussion is about US OCCUPYING Hawaii. Imagine thinking that a referendum of the occupiers on whether they want to keep occupying is a valid way to decide whether people who have bee OCCUPIED agree with the occupation. It's like if I moved into your house and put a gun to your head, and then ran a referendum to see if I should stay there.

                      The fact that you don't understand how idiotic your argument is shows what an utter imbecile you are.

                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        1 year ago

                        The discussion is about US OCCUPYING Hawaii

                        WRONG. you changed the subject to a straw man argument when you couldn’t argue the facts in good faith. Right here:

                        Show

                        going by your comment history, logical fallacies are something you’re an expert at wielding and often get comments removed and your account banned for it (and or your habit of throwing insult-ridden tantrums when your bad-faith tactics fail)

                        Show

                        The fact that you don’t understand how idiotic your argument is shows what an utter imbecile you are.

                        oh, look, more childish name-calling because you can’t argue in good faith based on the facts, and I’m some idiot who will fall fr your little tricks.

                        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                          hexagon
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          WRONG. you changed the subject to a straw man argument when you couldn’t argue the facts in good faith. Right here:

                          I see you have reading comprehension problems, which I guess is no surprise given that you communicate almost exclusively in children's pictures. The quote you screenshotted very clearly talks about the native population of Hawaii. You know the people who live there, not the people who are occupying them. Imagine not being able to understand that.

                          going by your comment history, logical fallacies are something you’re an expert at wielding and often get comments removed and your account banned for it (and or your habit of throwing insult-ridden tantrums when your bad-faith tactics fail)

                          Sounds like you're talking about yourself there colonizer.

                          oh, look, more childish name-calling because you can’t argue in good faith based on the facts, and I’m some idiot who will fall fr your little tricks.

                          I'm just making a basic observation about your level of intelligence based on your comment history. You are objectively an imbecile. This isn't me trying to insult you, that's just a basic fact.

                          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                            ·
                            1 year ago

                            I see you have reading comprehension problems

                            more insults not based in fact. just because I don’t fall for your countless logical fallacies and outright lies - all of which I’ve posted out and explained in detail - doesn’t mean I have any problems reading or comprehending. you’re just mad I keep calling you out. hence the insults.

                            and if you can’t even win an augment against “children’s pictures”… well, that’s certainly a self-own, as far as I’m concerned.

                            Sounds like you’re talking about yourself there colonizer.

                            “I know you are but what am I?” is not a convincing argument. most people learn this when they’re 5.

                            I’m just making a basic observation

                            you’re hurling insults because you’re mad, and can’t make an argument based on the facts. but keep trying to convince me you’re “entertained” while throwing name-calling tantrums, lmao

                    • ExLisper@linux.community
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Check title of this post. Do you see the word "native" there? In the title of this post that we're commenting in? "Native"? You see it?

                      • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        I see the comment I replied to, the context and words used, and how it was changed to suit an argument once the facts became inconvenient.

                        Show

                        perhaps you should pay closer attention to the conversation before you jump in unprepared.

                        • ExLisper@linux.community
                          ·
                          edit-2
                          1 year ago

                          Perhaps it was you that didn't pay attention to the title in the first place? Perhaps it's you that is raising the goal post? Perhaps, now that two different people explained to you that "people who live there" clearly meant "natives" it's time to acknowledge your mistake? Perhaps now that you've been explained what "occupation" means it's time to stop pretending we're talking about something else entirely?

                          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                            ·
                            1 year ago

                            Perhaps it was you that didn’t pay attention to the title in the first place?

                            see, I have proof, you have madboi rage you can’t process like a healthy person, so you direct it outwards at the person who pointed out - with evidence - that you’re wrong. classy.

                            now that two different people explained to you that “people who live there” clearly meant “natives”

                            you mean “moved the goalposts when they could win an argument and on facts”. lying now when there’s plenty f evidence here proving that you’re lying is a pretty bad way to try to convince someone of something.

                            Perhaps now that you’ve been explained what “occupation” means

                            I don’t need a bunch of angry trolls who can’ open their mouths without lies, rage, childish insults, and logical fallacies falling out to “explain” anything to me.

                            • ExLisper@linux.community
                              ·
                              1 year ago

                              I don’t need a bunch of angry trolls who can’ open their mouths without lies, rage, childish insults, and logical fallacies falling out to “explain” anything to me.

                              I'm pretty sure you understand what we're talking about here: what Native Hawaiians think about being part of the US. Your argument was that once native Hawaiians became minority there was a vote and the majority of immigrant, non-native inhabitants voted to legalize it's status so it's OK. I pointed out, that since we're taking about Native Hawaiians it doesn't really matter how non-natives voted on it. Instead of addressing this you just started using the old argument of "look only on the literal meaning of this comment and ignore the whole point of this discussion". And now here we are. You're angry and rejecting all arguments because being right about one phrase is more important to you than actually talking about this issue. Ok, so you win. You win the pointless discussion about one comment. Are you happy now? Can we now go back to the original point and talk about native Hawaiians? Or you're not actually interested in the topic and are here only to do some light trolling?

                              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                ·
                                edit-2
                                1 year ago

                                I’m pretty sure you understand what we’re talking about here:

                                I’m pretty sure I see through your logical fallacies and am not buying your mental gymnastics to cover for them.

                                this isn’t about “winning” just because that’s how you see the world, although I would categorically say that you’ve lost. lost time, lost face, and certainly lost your mind if you think you’ve won anything here.

                                Or you’re not actually interested in the topic and are here only to do some light trolling?

                                says the troll, lmao

                                • ExLisper@linux.community
                                  ·
                                  edit-2
                                  1 year ago

                                  Yes, you're really smart and you're crashing this online argument. You're logic is impeccable and you're arguments are flawless. I give up, you win!

                                  Changing the subject now, completely unrelated question: do you know how native Hawaiians feel about being part of the US?

                                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                                    ·
                                    edit-2
                                    1 year ago

                                    Yes, you’re really smart and you’re crashing this online argument. Your logic is impeccable and your arguments are flawless. I give up, you win!

                                    it’s sad this is the only way you can see the world. it explains your trolling.

                                    Changing the subject now

                                    why would I engage in a discussion with a troll, knowing full well you have no problem lying, twisting my words, and using very logical fallacy in the book?

      • Defaced@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can I ask you something? And this is me being genuine here, because I'm clearly out of the loop, but what is it about communism that you think is really great? Just forget about the capitalist propaganda comments, I want your genuine opinion, why is it great and what drew you to it?

          • Defaced@lemmy.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can choose not to answer and I respect that, I've seen you guys post around here a lot. While I have in the past tried to avoid those conversations, I've simply never given any of you a chance to speak your mind. Do I believe there are people on lemmy that just want to troll? Absolutely! There's people like that everywhere, I'm simply trying to understand your perspective because I've never engaged in the subject, now I'm intrigued. I've gotten to a point where I just have to know what drives you and why. Answer if you want or ignore me, I won't harass you about it. I'm just trying to give you a chance to speak and explain so I can better understand. There's no trickery here, I promise.

              • Defaced@lemmy.ml
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wow, that's a wild point of view. Thank you for sharing, that's actually really fascinating to see things from another perspective. Unfortunately I don't think I would ever agree to follow in those world views, but I respect your right to believe them and that's realistically what both sides need to achieve, mutual respect. So thanks.

                • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why don't you read some communist literature? There's 150 years worth of recommendations on almost every conceivable topic from many countries and in many languages. Almost all of us started as liberals until we read something that changed our minds. Once a Marxist has explained capitalism, there's almost no chance of going back (although some do, and they tend to become the worst type of monster).

    • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably not with the US around. It's never let any other country live in quiet peace and prosperity. It's always worth being optimistic, though.

        • WhatWouldKarlDo@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          First of all, that's not at all a reasonable reply to my comment. Second, how the hell do you have the gall to openly post this fascist garbage for all the world to see?

          • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            they voted to become a state in 1959, with a 93%+ majority. how is that “fascist” just because you disagree with it?

            Hawaii—a U.S. territory since 1898—became the 50th state in August, 1959, following a referendum in Hawaii in which more than 93% of the voters approved the proposition that the territory should be admitted as a state.

            There were many Hawaiian petitions for statehood during the first half of the 20th century. The voters wished to participate directly in electing their own governor and to have a full voice in national debates and elections that affected their lives. The voters also felt that statehood was warranted because they had demonstrated their loyalty—no matter what their ethnic background—to the U.S. to the fullest extent during World War II.

            (source)

            On June 27, 1959, a referendum asked residents of Hawaiʻi to vote on the statehood bill; 94.3% voted in favor of statehood and 5.7% opposed it. The referendum asked voters to choose between accepting the Act and remaining a U.S. territory. The United Nations' Special Committee on Decolonization later removed Hawaiʻi from its list of non-self-governing territories.

            (source)

            • WhatWouldKarlDo@lemmygrad.ml
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because you are saying it was 100 years ago, so your crimes no longer matter. The holocaust is coming up on 100 years ago now as well. I'm guessing that all the peoples murdered by the Nazis should just get over it and start loving the fascists now as well?

              As for your garbage referendum, see my reply to your other post with this garbage.

              • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because you are saying it was 100 years ago, so your crimes no longer matter.

                YOU are saying that, not me. keep your words out of my mouth.

                The holocaust...

                Show

                As for your garbage referendum

                “I don’t like it, so I’m going to call it names!”

                grow up

                • WhatWouldKarlDo@lemmygrad.ml
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I confused you with the other fascist above, whose post I was replying to.

                  Hawaii was annexed in 1898. So, why dredge up anger at the conquest over 100 years later?

                  You're just here sealioning on an attempt to justify ethnic cleansing. The Holocaust comparison is NOT a false equivalence by the way. Hitler was inspired by the US.

                    • WhatWouldKarlDo@lemmygrad.ml
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      1 year ago

                      I already blocked him. I'm native and I'm somewhat used to hearing this nonsense. But it still doesn't do good things for me, and he has nothing useful to say anyway. It's all debate perversion with a hard on for colonialism. Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that it's just a lame attempt to justify the subjugation of Hawaii.

                      • Bloobish [comrade/them]
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        1 year ago

                        Any situation that began with land being stolen from native people via coup and gun-point means anything thereafter is a colonial and imperialist action that creates easily understandable echos of inequality and suffering. For instance lots of Native populations being unable to afford their land, or having to exist as permanent renters, and then also having to suffer ecological consequences such as guinea grass (imported by colonial cattle ranchers into Hawaii that now dries out and burns easily yet has not been removed) causing wild fires that burn entire communities (not to forget the blackrock owned electric company having shitty ill maintained equipment around such communities).

                  • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You’re just here sealioning on an attempt to justify ethnic cleansing. The Holocaust comparison is NOT a false equivalence by the way. Hitler was inspired by the US.

                    This article doesn’t even mention Hawaii, colonialism, or anything related to it. It speaks of Hitler’s inspiration drawn from slavery and ideas of race superiority towards black people. Not only did you obviously just google “Hitler US inspiration” to cherry-pick something about Hitler, you clearly neither read it or have any understanding of the material.

                    so, yeah, it’s a false equivalence AND now you're

                    Show

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      Judging by their history, probably not. Just like people's everywhere, Hawaiians have a very violent history full of warfare!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Nu%CA%BBuanu

      "Caught between the Hawaiian Army and a 1000-foot drop, over 700 Oʻahu warriors either jumped or were pushed over the edge of the Pali (cliff). In 1898 construction workers working on the Pali road discovered 800 skulls which were believed to be the remains of the warriors that fell to their deaths from the cliff above."