9/11 qin-shi-huangdi-fireball

Building implosion

In the controlled demolition industry, building implosion is the strategic placing of explosive material and timing of its detonation so that a structure collapses on itself in a matter of seconds, minimizing the physical damage to its immediate surroundings. Despite its terminology, building implosion also includes the controlled demolition of other structures, like bridges, smokestacks, towers, and tunnels. This is typically done to save time and money of what would otherwise be an extensive demolition process with construction equipment, as well as to reduce construction workers exposure to infrastructure that is in severe disrepair.

Building implosion, which reduces to seconds a process which could take months or years to achieve by other methods, typically occurs in urban areas[citation needed] and often involves large landmark structures.

The actual use of the term "implosion" to refer to the destruction of a building is a misnomer. This had been stated of the destruction of 1515 Tower in West Palm Beach, Florida. "What happens is, you use explosive materials in critical structural connections to allow gravity to bring it down.

The term "implosion" was coined by my grandmother back in, I guess, the '60s. It's a more descriptive way to explain what we do than "explosion". There are a series of small explosions, but the building itself isn't erupting outward. It's actually being pulled in on top of itself. What we're really doing is removing specific support columns within the structure and then cajoling the building in one direction or another, or straight down.

  • Stacy Loizeaux, NOVA, December 1996

Building implosion techniques do not rely on the difference between internal and external pressure to collapse a structure. Instead, the goal is to induce a progressive collapse by weakening or removing critical supports; therefore, the building can no longer withstand gravity loads and will fail under its own weight

Numerous small explosives, strategically placed within the structure, are used to catalyze the collapse. Nitroglycerin, dynamite, or other explosives are used to shatter reinforced concrete supports. Linear shaped charges are used to sever steel supports. These explosives are progressively detonated on supports throughout the structure. Then, explosives on the lower floors initiate the controlled collapse.

A simple structure like a chimney can be prepared for demolition in less than a day. Larger or more complex structures can take up to six months of preparation to remove internal walls and wrap columns with fabric and fencing before firing the explosives.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • GaveUp [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    *manager tells us to work faster because his bosses told him to tell us to work faster because the stock price fell a lot*

    *I work faster and quality of code drops*

    "Why can't you just work fast and have high quality code"

    Gee man maybe it's because I'm literally the only person on my team with a life and acts like a human instead of a robot

    Where it's normal here for people to tell others to message them for help on vacation, not take any vacation even when maxed out on days b/c they admit they don't know what to do, work at nights after a full day in the office even when they have a spouse and kids at home, drink 3-5 cups of coffee every morning to laser focus, and not say morning/bye/leave people still eating lunch to maximize productivity

    Man where the fuck are these fake desk jobs, all my coding ones have been far too real, and they keep getting realer every new job I get

    • Wakmrow [he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      From the QA side feedback was you're not testing quickly enough or opening enough issues. Then it was you missed some issues.

      Maybe I just suck at my job who knows.

      • GaveUp [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        lol, rushing QA is such a bad idea. And you know they're only rushing you cause there's so many issues from rushing the devs...

        I don't even have QA, it's all test my rushed code in prod on 1% of our users lol