then there's the question of whether or not the guide is comprehensive.
if this guide is comprehensive, then you shouldn't be reading the post that you are reading. but if it isn't, then you should read the post that you wouldn't read that you are reading.
and what do we define as "comprehensive"? is comprehension subjective? how subjective are the rules that define what is and isn't subjective?
is this post comprehensive by virtue of our interpretation of subjective theory, or is this post inherently incomprehensive by being a badpost that is distributed through the medium of c/badposting?
then there's the question of whether or not the guide is comprehensive.
if this guide is comprehensive, then you shouldn't be reading the post that you are reading. but if it isn't, then you should read the post that you wouldn't read that you are reading.
and what do we define as "comprehensive"? is comprehension subjective? how subjective are the rules that define what is and isn't subjective?
is this post comprehensive by virtue of our interpretation of subjective theory, or is this post inherently incomprehensive by being a badpost that is distributed through the medium of c/badposting?