because it sucks.

  • Aquilae [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why You Shouldn't Read This Comment: A Comprehensive Guide

    In the age of digital communication, the internet has become a vast, sprawling landscape filled with countless voices and opinions. Among this cacophony, comments sections have emerged as a particularly fertile ground for a wide range of interactions, from thoughtful discourse to vitriolic attacks. However, within these digital forums, a specific comment exists that should be approached with extreme caution: the "Why You Shouldn't Read This Comment" comment.

    This essay will delve into the characteristics, motivations, and potential consequences of this comment. By understanding the nature of this statement, readers can equip themselves with the tools to navigate the comment more critically and selectively.

    • Direct threats or insults: This comment may contain explicit threats of violence, harassment, or other forms of abuse directed at the reader or the original author.
    • Ad hominem attacks: Personal attacks on the character, intelligence, or appearance of the reader or the original author can be used to discredit their arguments.
    • Offensive or hateful language: The use of offensive, discriminatory, or hateful language can create a hostile and unwelcoming environment.
    • Trolling or baiting: The comment may be designed to provoke a reaction from the reader, leading to a flame war or other undesirable interactions.
    • False claims or misinformation: The comment may contain false or misleading information that is intended to confuse or deceive the reader.

    The Motivation Behind This Comment

    The motivations behind the "Why You Shouldn't Read This Comment" comment are varied and complex. The commenter may have engaged in such behavior out of genuine anger or frustration, perhaps for malicious intent or simply for entertainment. Common motivations include:

    • Seeking attention: I may have posted this comment to gain attention or notoriety, even if it comes at the expense of others.
    • Expressing anger or frustration: I may be feeling angry or frustrated and lash out at others through this comment as a result.
    • Trolling or baiting: I may enjoy provoking reactions from others and may use this comment to achieve that goal.

    The Consequences of Engaging with This Comment

    Engaging with "Why You Shouldn't Read This Comment" comments can have a number of negative consequences. These include:

    • Emotional distress: Reading this comment can be emotionally distressing and can contribute to feelings of anxiety, anger, or sadness.
    • Wasted time: Engaging in this comment or other unproductive interactions can waste valuable time and energy.
    • Damage to reputation: Participating in online conflicts can damage one's reputation and make it difficult to maintain positive relationships with others.
    • Legal consequences: In some cases, engaging with this comment can lead to legal consequences, such as defamation or harassment lawsuits.

    Strategies for Avoiding and Dealing with This Comment

    To protect oneself from the negative consequences of the "Why You Shouldn't Read This Comment" comment, it is important to adopt effective strategies for avoiding and dealing with such statements. These strategies include:

    • Ignoring the comment: Often, the best approach is to simply ignore the comment and continue the discussion without engaging with the negative behavior.
    • Reporting the comment: If the comment violates the platform's rules or community guidelines, it should be reported to the moderators.
    • Blocking the user: Blocking the user who posted the comment can prevent future interactions.
    • Cultivating a positive online community: By participating in online communities that promote respectful and constructive discourse, readers can create a more positive and welcoming environment.

    Conclusion

    The "Why You Shouldn't Read This Comment" comment is a pervasive phenomenon in this post. Understanding the nature, motivations, and consequences of this statement is essential for navigating the digital landscape safely and effectively. By adopting effective strategies for avoiding and dealing with this comment, readers can protect themselves from emotional distress, wasted time, and potential legal consequences. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to engage with this comment is a personal one. However, by being aware of the risks involved, readers can make informed choices and create a more positive and productive online experience.

  • aaro [they/them, she/her]
    ·
    5 days ago

    Okay thanks, I think I've got that all. Time to put it into practice.

    Oh wait oh fuck

    • asante [comrade/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      5 days ago

      for everyone who's just joined us, this is what's happening in @aaro@hexbear.net's brain:

      • aaro tries to read post
      • they see it's a "comprehensive" guide on why not to read the post that they are reading
      • guide is 3 words, therefore guide is not comprehensive
      • argument of the post is baseless and there is no reason to not read the post
      • they won't not read the post therefore they should read the post
      • cycle repeats blob-no-thoughts
      • aaro [they/them, she/her]
        ·
        5 days ago

        Thanks for breaking it down honestly that really helps, let me give this another go

        i-told-you-dog stairs

        • asante [comrade/them]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          then there's the question of whether or not the guide is comprehensive.

          if this guide is comprehensive, then you shouldn't be reading the post that you are reading. but if it isn't, then you should read the post that you wouldn't read that you are reading.

          and what do we define as "comprehensive"? is comprehension subjective? how subjective are the rules that define what is and isn't subjective?

          is this post comprehensive by virtue of our interpretation of subjective theory, or is this post inherently incomprehensive by being a badpost that is distributed through the medium of c/badposting?