• LesbianLiberty [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Soviet Union ended the Holocaust, the only thing standing between the annihilation of Korea was the DPRK, without the communist party China would have been erased and become japanese territory. The people most able and willing to end genocide at the end of the day are communists.

        • edge [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ahh yes, the “genocide” triggered by a drought and kulaks burning crops out of spite where more Russians and Kazakhs died than Ukrainians. And the “genocide” where Uyghurs were exempted from the one child rule and have an increasing population, and there’s zero evidence (or even claims) of any killings.

        • 1nt3rd1m3nt10n4l [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          "Double Genocide" historiography is literally Nazi propaganda. It's not even a view supported by actual academic researchers & historians who are critical of the states which you are talking about.

        • Egon
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          deleted by creator

        • sammer510 [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only things the Soviets did wrong was not killing enough people actually. Too many Nazis were allowed to survive by the US and UK

    • Nakoichi [they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I'm not even a tankie lol you make all these assumptions about me just because of the instance I am on.

    • ReadFanon [any, any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yikes!

      You:

      You don't know shit about my political opinions

      Also you:

      Stop putting words in my mouth you little shit, you KNOW I don't think that

      Remarkable how you apply a completely different standard of behaviour to others than you do to yourself. The person you replied to literally has an anarchist flag in their profile picture and, if you wanted to, you'd be able to confirm that they're an anarchist based on their comment history. Or you could have just asked. Heck, you could have even told them straight up that you're skeptical of their political orientation and you'd probably get a straight answer out of them in response.

      I wonder what an anarchist would have to say about a person who egregiously and wilfully applies double standards? They probably wouldn't care. It's not like it's a big deal to anarchists to avoid the imposing of unjust hierarchies in the attempt to coerce others into silence and/or being banned via guilt-by-association. It's probably completely fine.

    • tuga [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look at the way you talk, you're a child