borschtisgarbo@lemmygrad.ml to chapotraphouse • 1 month agowhy did the sino-soviet split have to happen?imagemessage-square55 fedilinkarrow-up197
arrow-up197imagewhy did the sino-soviet split have to happen?borschtisgarbo@lemmygrad.ml to chapotraphouse • 1 month agomessage-square55 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareComradeMonotreme [she/her, he/him]hexbear55·edit-21 month agoGenerally I feel with the Sino Soviet split, USSR was right for the wrong reason, PRC wrong for the right reasons. link
minus-squareRedcuban1959 [any]hexbear46·1 month agoKhrushchev (Cornman) was a cringe revisionist, but he did some good stuff. China was right on being critical of Cornman, but their actions after that were cringe. link
minus-squareComradeMonotreme [she/her, he/him]hexbear8·1 month agoYeah pretty much Krushchev and the USSR were usually on the correct side (Cuba, Vietnam etc). The PRC were often correct in their criticism of the USSR's revisionism but lead to bad stuff like supporting Pol Pot and the Muhjahaden. link
Generally I feel with the Sino Soviet split, USSR was right for the wrong reason, PRC wrong for the right reasons.
What?
Khrushchev (Cornman) was a cringe revisionist, but he did some good stuff. China was right on being critical of Cornman, but their actions after that were cringe.
Yeah pretty much Krushchev and the USSR were usually on the correct side (Cuba, Vietnam etc).
The PRC were often correct in their criticism of the USSR's revisionism but lead to bad stuff like supporting Pol Pot and the Muhjahaden.