https://archive.li/Z0m5m

The Russian commander of the “Vostok” Battalion fighting in southern Ukraine said on Thursday that Ukraine will not be defeated and suggested that Russia freeze the war along current frontlines.

Alexander Khodakovsky made the candid concession yesterday on his Telegram channel after Russian forces, including his own troops, were devastatingly defeated by Ukrainian marines earlier this week at Urozhaine in the Zaporizhzhia-Donetsk regional border area.

“Can we bring down Ukraine militarily? Now and in the near future, no,” Khodakovsky, a former official of the so-called Donetsk People’s Republic, said yesterday.

“When I talk to myself about our destiny in this war, I mean that we will not crawl forward, like the [Ukrainians], turning everything into [destroyed] Bakhmuts in our path. And, I do not foresee the easy occupation of cities,” he said.

      • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait a minute.. Who invaded Ukraine in 2014, and again in 2021? Who illegally annexed sovereign territory? America is not blameless, but in this war they are just the arms dealer

        • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          1 year ago

          The USA has been training Ukraine military and irregulars for years. They organized a volunteer force to go fight there. They sent their politicians to support the right-wing coup. What the fuck are you talking about they are just arms dealers? They are providing recon and military intelligence, they are mobilizing their satellites and aerial assets, they are doing political work to get other nations to provide support and they are putting constraints on peace deals. They are not a fucking arms dealer.

        • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          if you are right and they are just an arms dealer they are still the bad guys. You understand arm's dealers are bad people right?

          • UFODivebomb@programming.dev
            ·
            1 year ago

            No. That's a reductionist take.

            "Can we have some weapons to defend ourselves?"

            "No! That'd make us evil. You should just die. "

            Oh a hexbear. ... You lot only have overly simplistic takes.

            • InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh a hexbear. ... You lot only have overly simplistic takes.

              When we respond to blatant ignorance with carefully chosen wording, backing up our position with citations and links, and calmly explaining the nuance of complex geopolitical realities, we get accused of "always throwing walls of text at people." When we answer that same ignorance with short and pithy responses, we "only have simplistic takes."

              parenti-hands

              There's no winning with you simple-minded dronies, but I guess there never is when one side can just make shit up that fits their vibes-based outlook on the world.

                • InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What are you even asking for? What do you want citations on? As I made very clear with quoted text, I was responding to a claim about everyone on the hexbear instance.

                  Do you want citations and careful wording that hexbear people use citations and careful wording? Or do you want citations and careful wording about something specific having to do with the topic of the OP? In either case, just read the comments from hexbear users all over this thread.

                  • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You're claiming that you argue from a valid point of citing your arguments, and presented zero citation. The person the replied to needed no citations for their argument because they presented ideas, not facts. You're raging trying to tell people to cite things but you're sitting in your tower without presenting citations. You're a ragebait clown 🤡

                    • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      You said:

                      You’re claiming that you argue from a valid point of citing your arguments, and presented zero citation. The person the replied to needed no citations for their argument because they presented ideas, not facts. You’re raging trying to tell people to cite things but you’re sitting in your tower without presenting citations. You’re a ragebait clown 🤡

                      It's unclear whether you're deliberately misinterpreting InappropriateEmote or whether you simply don't understand them. Either way, it seems sensible to quote the text that you're replying to:

                      When we respond to blatant ignorance with carefully chosen wording, backing up our position with citations and links, and calmly explaining the nuance of complex geopolitical realities, we get accused of “always throwing walls of text at people.” When we answer that same ignorance with short and pithy responses, we “only have simplistic takes.”

                      This means that when Hexbear users present a longer argument with references, they get accused of writing walls of text. In response to this criticism, there is another approach: short and pithy responses.

                      InappropriateEmote is unambiguously saying that in this example they went with option 2, a short and pithy response. They are not claiming to have provided a longer argument with references.

                      This was said in response to a quip intended to shut down the discussion rather than deal with a critique:

                      Oh a hexbear. … You lot only have overly simplistic takes.

                      The alternative (dealing with the substance of the claim) would have required accepting all the other evidence that the US is both arms dealer and directly involved in running the Ukraine war and directing where it's dealt arms go. Again as with yours, there was an attempt to decontextualize what a Hexbear user said so as to dismiss the overall argument without addressing it's crucial features.

                      It is entirely unclear what point you're trying to make by distinguishing ideas from facts. Unless it's a weird brag about being grounded in unfounded opinion rather than fact, which, if it is, is not the argument you think it is.

                  • InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No one ever said we are always right, and we can't be, because our internal struggle sessions are well know. We weren't even able to federate for 3 years due to incompatible code, and in that time, disagreed (to put it lightly) on things all the time in ways where both sides can't be right. I realize it can be convenient for you to talk about people you're trying to disparage as a monolith, but I assure you, no hexbear thinks hexbears are always right.

                    But when it comes to actually knowing shit about geopolitics, and understanding realities beyond the narrative that has been crafted to justify the ruling class' dominance and hegemony, it's hard to get it wrong when you're talking to propagandized liberals who eat up that narrative like good little unquestioning beneficiaries of empire. That much is true.

            • CascadeOfLight [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              You should just die

              Yes, rip bozos

              Show
              Show

              My eternal grief for the hundreds of thousands of innocent Ukrainians pressed into the meatgrinder by their Nazi overlords, eternal death to the genocidal Kiev regime and their campaign of extermination against their own country's citizens of Russian descent for eight years

              Show

              Show

              CW: literally, unfathomably vile

              Show

              The Ukrainian fascist soldiers are offering you cans of 'Separatist Baby Meat'!

              • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
                ·
                1 year ago

                You realize the people in those photos are Russian citizens and connected to Wagner PMC, right? Identify each of them for us and prove you know what the hell you're posting. Anyone can post a picture of a Nazi flag and say "See? SEE!??"

                • InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, those damn Ruskies sure love carrying around banner portraits of Stepan Bandera and flying blue and yellow flags next to their swastikas and black suns and wolfsangels.

                  All of these are Russian's too, right? Especially the ones that say Azov Battalion? https://leftypol.org/edu/src/1662026001627.webm

                  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I'm sure no Russian would ever got a Ukrainian flash for propaganda. /s

                    • SoyViking [he/him]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Ukraine good, Russia bad. It follows that these Ukrainians doing bad stuff are in fact Russians.

                      It's a non-falsifiable orthodoxy that turns evidence on its head until it fits the pre-conceived narrative.

                    • InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Do you enjoy carrying water for literal fascists?

                      Reposting the same link as in my other comment, just because it so perfectly demonstrates how stupid and/or disingenuous it is to think that the near infinite written and photographic examples of Ukraine's love of nazi iconography is actually a Russian false flag attempt:

                      https://leftypol.org/edu/src/1662026001627.webm

                • Flaps [he/him]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You realize the people in those photos are Russian citizens and connected to Wagner PMC, right?

                  Uh yea gonna need you to identify these Russian citizens in those pro bandera, ukraine flag waving marches here.

                  • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Uh yeah gonna need the person claiming the photos are legit to post some proof. Burden of proof is on the presenter. That was my comment that you replied to. Since you can't, we can assume you are arguing in bad faith and have nothing to contribute

                    • Flaps [he/him]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Bruv Idk what to tell you ukraine has a known problem with its far right elements, and here are pictures presented of exactly that.

                      Uh yeah gonna need the person claiming the photos are legit to post some proof

                      YOU claimed these pictures were Wagner pmcs dressing up and holding fake far right marches with Ukrainian iconography. YOU back that claim up.

                      • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        And the person posting them produced no sources.

                        Tell you what: I'll post a picture of Martha Stewart and Snoop (there are lots of these photos on the interwebs) and then I'll start telling everyone Martha is Snoop's secret lover. I've presented a narrative that cannot be proven and is not the real story, BUT THERE ARE PICTURES! You see, without some sort of context and verification, any picture can be used to present a false narrative.

                        • Flaps [he/him]
                          ·
                          edit-2
                          1 year ago

                          Okay well

                          presented a narrative that cannot be proven and is not the real story

                          Ukraines problems with the far right HAVE been proven tho

                          www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-far-right-menace-radical-militants-ultranationalists/amp/

                          Interesting last part of linked article:

                          Acknowledging that reality does not turn the Kiev government into a nest of fascists, as Kremlin propaganda has claimed, nor does it absolve Russia of its assault on Ukraine’s sovereignty and illegal seizure of Crimea. Ignoring Ukraine’s far right, on the other hand, can have dire consequences for the very dream of a free and democratic country which so many Ukrainians have fought, suffered, and died for.

                          Guess what you're doing?

                          Next link is an article by The Guardian. It includes a collection of pictures, too. Are you going to tell them to identify every single person in those pictures, too?

                          https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/11/ultranationalism-in-ukraine-a-photo-essay

                          Another one by The Guardian:

                          https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/10/azov-far-right-fighters-ukraine-neo-nazis

                          Next article is by Reuters. The article opens with said paragraphe:

                          As Ukraine’s struggle against Russia and its proxies continues, Kiev must also contend with a growing problem behind the front lines: far-right vigilantes who are willing to use intimidation and even violence to advance their agendas, and who often do so with the tacit approval of law enforcement agencies.

                          https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cohen-ukraine-commentary-idUKKBN1GV2TY

                          Please note I've used exclusively western sources of which I suspect you'd refer to too. There are more, but I'm doubting your intellectual honest and curiosity, as these links were just one Google Search away.

                          And before you call me a putler bot or anything, as your types often do, fuck putin, the war is horrible and the fact he started it is unforgivable. Russia is a neoliberal state that in no way aligns with my own ideology. This doesn't mean I have to all of a sudden voice support for the Ukrainian state or nato for that matter, considering the many crimes of said state and military pact. It's a war between neoliberal, highly corrupt states in which the Russian and ukrainian working class stand nothing to gain.

                          What I'd wish to see (apart from revolutionary defeatism on both sides and a socialist takover of both states) is an end to the killing, the full return of Russia to the 2021 borders, independence for loehansk and donetsk, a neutral ukraine as a buffer between nato and Russia. But nothing points to Russia willing to give up gained ground, or to Ukraine being able to break through the russian defences. Looking at a map showing the gains after two months of counteroffensive makes this clear, it's something I feel we can't deny. To think ukraine is going to reach the sea of azov or crimea is nothing but hopeful idealism at best.

                          So, assuming you too want and end to the killing, and view the saving of human lives as more important than regaining the regions currently occupied, we'd have to think about the fastest way to do that. Is it to keep sending shipments of weapons and ammo to Ukraine? Well, NATO has been doing that for a year and a half now, not exactly to great effect. Note that in that time, hundreds of thousands of people were killed or injured. We can scream that putin should just retreat back to the border, but we both know that's just not going to happen, no matter how many conscripts are sent into Russian minefields and artillery kill zones.

                          Well.. Then what remain? In my mind, it's negotiations. Ukraine will be presented with terms they deem unacceptable, but if they don't want to run out of Ukrainians, they'll have to accept. I suspect they'll have to wave goodye to the donbas region, but I also believe the citizens of said region would rather be either independent or integrated as Russian territory.

                          What would you like to happen, and how do you see that happening? Oh and if you ever get around to identifying the Russians in those pictures, hmu.

        • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I were to understand history based entirely on two or three headlines in The Atlantic

          • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ahhh let's talk about those! The one in Russia last month was pretty cool. Sending Wagner to Belarus to mess with Poland, only for Poland to send 10,000 troops and see Wagner get shipped out of Belarus was pretty funny. Russia keeps trying the same playbook, and now it's being met with equal force, so they're pissed. Same reason the EU border states just expelled thousands of Russian citizens.

            They keep trying to stage coups using Russian citizens. The coup in Ukraine in 2014 was preceded by a border buildup of "special operation forces." It also noteworthy how Russia has changed the lingo and now calls it "War in Ukraine."

    • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are you talking about? I said I don't like America. How did you get it backwards?

          • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mate. Respect for Marriage Act 2022 is a federal law protecting same sex marriages. It's there. It's fact. Bwaha etc.

              • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                ·
                1 year ago

                That's not the point. I feel I've already answered your argument in other comments. If you don't agree, please let me know why and I'll happily address it.

                      • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        I mean that's just completely false. The Act requires the U.S. federal government and all U.S. states and territories to recognize the validity of same-sex marriages.

                        From the Act:

                        Congress finds the following: ((a) In General.--No person acting under color of State law may deny-- (1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or (2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.

                        Seems pretty clear, no?

                        Again I'm not trying to say this is a fait accompli and we can just sit back on our laurels and consider it done. But it's a hell of a lot better than Russia's law.

            • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              yikes-1 yikes-2 yikes-3

              Someone else is going to have to explain the ignorance present in this statement for I do not have the time or energy, could one of our cishet hexbears be a good ally?

              • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You are incapable. That is because the comment is factually correct. US Federal law has protections for queerness. The cited law proves it. What point are you trying to make exactly?

                • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The long and short of it is that legalizing gay marriage isn't even a strong step to lgbt liberation, it is literally just tepid assimilationism. We are only "accepted by federal law" in most narrow and on their terms sense. Call me when the US government federally covers trans Healthcare, makes conversion torture a federal crime, deals with the queer(especially child) homelessness problem, and purges the people calling us all pedophiles.

                  Also, learn some fucking humility.

                  • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    But that's not what was under discussion. Does there exist a federal law which protects queerness?
                    Yes, yes there does.

                    Is it perfect? By no means, there's a long way to go. But the characterization of the US as queerphobic in the context of comparison to Russia is a nonsense. Both-sidesing this issue is a disgusting affront to the LGBTQ people suffering under Putin.

                    • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      1 year ago

                      You're original wording was:

                      which accepts queerness in its federal law.

                      You do not know what queerness is if you think that is met by gay marriage being legalized federally.

                      Is it perfect? By no means, there's a long way to go. But the characterization of the US as queerphobic in the context of comparison to Russia is a nonsense. Both-sidesing this issue is a disgusting affront to the LGBTQ people suffering under Putin.

                      This is whataboutism. Also US capitalists fund the passage of anti-lgbt laws and hate campaigns globally that create basically pogroms against gay and trans people. So it is ridiculous because the US is much worse to gay and trans people globally.

                      They also helped illegally and undemocratically dissolve the USSR and created the situation for Putin to exist in in the first place. Who knows, if they didn't interfere maybe the USSR would currently be as progressive as Cuba is on the issue of queer liberation. And Ukrainian and NATO capitalists and Russian capitalists wouldn't be sending conscripts to their deaths.

                      • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        Legalising same sex marriage is an acceptance of queerness. At no point did I say that the issue was "met" (i.e. settled). In fact, I clearly said "it's not perfect".

                        Its not whataboutism though. It's a response to the original (flippant) claim that the US is a queerphobic dictatorship.

                        I have not seen any pogroms against gay or trans people that have been funded or supported by the US government. Maybe going back a ways?

                        I fucking hate the US government. Just need to mention that. They're a joke and I want to see huge reforms, though I don't hold out much hope.
                        I hate the Russian government more, and with good reason, especially on the issue of queerphobia. Are you genuinely of the belief that the Russian government is less queerphobic than the US govt? If so, please explain that to me in big letters so that I can understand properly.

                        • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
                          ·
                          edit-2
                          1 year ago

                          Legalising same sex marriage is an acceptance of queerness

                          Its not going to get less ridiculous if you keep saying it.

                          Are you even lgbt? Maybe you should ask some trans leftists what they think of this. Maybe read some Leslie Feinberg.

                          It's a response to the original (flippant) claim that the US is a queerphobic dictatorship.

                          It is lmao. It is literally a dictatorship of capital with the most queer people imprisoned per population.

                          I have not seen any pogroms against gay or trans people that have been funded or supported by the US government. Maybe going back a ways?

                          Look at every single liberation movements that they mass murdered and you will find countless queer folks. Queer folks have always lead the charge against US imperialism in such movements.

                          But also, I'm talking about US capitalists lobbying governments and running private campaigns. And the capitalists and the government are in the same bed together.

                          I fucking hate the US government. Just need to mention that. They're a joke and I want to see huge reforms, though I don't hold out much hope. I hate the Russian government more, and with good reason, especially on the issue of queerphobia. Are you genuinely of the belief that the Russian government is less queerphobic than the US govt? If so, please explain that to me in big letters so that I can understand properly.

                          Yes, they are more queerphobic, because they kill more queer people globally, and seek to destroy liberation movements globally. Russia might have worse laws but the US has more queer blood on its hands, and is ultimately responsible for a right wing Russian government existing in the first place.

                          • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                            ·
                            edit-2
                            1 year ago

                            its not going to get less ridiculous if you keep saying it.

                            Nor will it get any less true until you refute it.

                            Are you even LGBT?

                            Fuck off. I don't know you.

                            The US is a plutocracy. You need to have a look at the definitions. It's definitely not a dictatorship because there is a regular handover of power. Is it any better than a dictatorship? Up for discussion. But the definitions of words have to matter, and you've got the wrong one.

                            So no examples of US government-led/supported pogroms against queer people then? Not even a single link to a pogrom which was supported by someone who was supported by an American capitalist who is demonstrably in bed with the American government? That's looking like a pretty weak line of argument at the minute, though I'm open to hearing more.

                            Your last paragraph is similarly hugely lacking in supporting evidence. It may be true, but at the moment I have to dismiss it utterly since it's just your opinion, and, again, I don't know you.

                            • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
                              ·
                              edit-2
                              1 year ago

                              Most of what youre saying isn't worth responding to; for example, claiming that the rich aren't in bed with our politicians lol, but for the audience, some history:

                              Here the Yankees are admitting to influencing the elections after the coup to keep the communists out of power because the people had previously voted not to dissolve the USSR before the coup and they were afraid of communists regaining control of the government.

                              Here is a fun article on how the US is responsible for violence targetting lgbt people worldwide Just a tiny sample though

                              Here is a relevant essay on liberals like you speaking over queer liberation activists.

                              • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                                ·
                                1 year ago

                                Except I never made that claim. Is English not your first language? Your comprehension seems a bit below par and I don't want to bully you out of the conversation if that's the case. I could be less idiomatic if that would help?

                                • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
                                  ·
                                  edit-2
                                  1 year ago

                                  Not even a single link to a pogrom which was supported by someone who was supported by an American capitalist who is demonstrably in bed with the American government?

                                  Stop being a debate pervert.

                                      • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                                        ·
                                        1 year ago

                                        Yep. They don't prove the US is a queerphobic dictatorship. Not even close. I don't know what more to say. Maybe you should open your mind a bit? There is some pretty good literature out there on the nature and inherent value of truth that might be illuminating for you.

                                        And one last thing. I'm not a liberal. Not everyone who you argue with is.

                                            • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                                              ·
                                              1 year ago

                                              ? You said you weren't a liberal, suggesting that you think you're something else. Which raises the question, what is that?

                                                • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                                                  ·
                                                  1 year ago

                                                  Okay you say you're not a liberal and you're an anti-capitalist but what are you, in the positive? Unless you only define yourself by what you're not?

                                                  • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                                                    ·
                                                    1 year ago

                                                    I'm not into identity politics either. I am far left, anti authority, pro-worker, pro-human, pro-science. Lots of things. What about you?

                                                    • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                                                      ·
                                                      1 year ago

                                                      I'm a Marxist. I reject identity politics, too. You should look into Marxism. It could be right up your street.

                                                      • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                                                        ·
                                                        1 year ago

                                                        Nice! I've read the manifesto, most of Das Kapital and some of his essays and his thinking is a big part of my worldview. I'm reading "at the café" by Malatesta at the moment and I think I like it enough to recommend.

                                    • Flaps [he/him]
                                      ·
                                      1 year ago

                                      You've been provided what you've asked for now shut up and read it loser

                                        • Flaps [he/him]
                                          ·
                                          1 year ago

                                          While I disagree, I can see where you're coming from. Shouldn't have called you that. Gonna do some introspection, since this entire federation thing and the influx of bad faith actors I didn't encounter for three years, interaction with other users has made me pretty hostile. Sorry about that.

                              • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                                ·
                                1 year ago

                                If the act protected queer people, then I would defend Saudi Arabia against comparisons with countries that actively litigate against the existence of queer people, like Russia, yes.
                                But I would not consider it proof that Saudi was accepting of queer people. For that I would probably look at testimonies of queer people in the country. Like the ones you can see from millions of US citizens.

                                  • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                                    ·
                                    1 year ago

                                    That seems like something which would be infinitely harder to do with Saudi subjects. Probably because they aren't allowed to be gay.

                                      • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
                                        ·
                                        1 year ago

                                        Glad to have surprised you. And yet, if you actually parse what I'm saying, you'll see that the evidence in providing is a presumed lack of testimony being evidence of a lack of acceptance which indicates a comparison which is favourable to my argument.

    • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Me, losing every chess game I ever play, but at least my mind is pure because I don't think like those dirty white pieces.