Honestly I'd argue being open to feedback is the primary requirement to succeeding at...well most anything long-term. So it's not exactly a small difference
i think people of almost every political position like to flatter themselves by saying they're uniquely receptive to feedback and new information and therefore a superior critical thinker. like, saying it does not make it so.
Most "open office" corpo schemes have a "welcome feedback" policy that just determines who gets fired and who gets promoted based upon invisible court intrigue shit.
This is a thread about needing a coping mechanism because someone told them two factual statements about the Obama administration that they didn't like. We definitely get ahead of ourselves about this stuff too but NL is just page after page of
i think people of almost every political position like to flatter themselves by saying they're uniquely receptive to feedback and new information and therefore a superior critical thinker. like, saying it does not make it so.
Most "open office" corpo schemes have a "welcome feedback" policy that just determines who gets fired and who gets promoted based upon invisible court intrigue shit.
This is a thread about needing a coping mechanism because someone told them two factual statements about the Obama administration that they didn't like. We definitely get ahead of ourselves about this stuff too but NL is just page after page of