• came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    11 months ago

    this goes well with that meme talking about how like 70% of china's youth want to be cosmonauts and scientists and like 70% of US youth want to be social media influencers and e-sports champions.

    which, itself, goes well with that economist headline about how the former soviet bloc states have a "problem" where half the scientists are women due to the legacy of women in STEM making women feel "forced" to have careers in science.

    if you haven't heard the episode of Citations Needed (Episode 98: The Refined Sociopathy of The Economist), it is incredible. their archives are available but behind a massive paywall and when one sees some of their radioactive takes over the last 170 years with the power of hindsight, it becomes obvious why they did that.

    you'll never guess how the rational, reasonable liberals felt about the movement to abolish slavery!

    • MCU_H8ER@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      11 months ago

      I remember listening to the episode where they were reading NYY opinion pieces about how it's not the right time to abolish slavery.

  • cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    11 months ago

    China's youth, even when faced with some of the difficulties and challenges in China, are still way more motivated and reasonable and directed than most Americans. This fever-dream and delusional cover story from Time is like Olympus Mons saying the Empire State Building is too tall.

    • SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      11 months ago

      My perception of time is off because it’s a little shocking that The Economist is at least as old as Lenin.

  • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
    cake
    ·
    11 months ago

    What is the point of BRICS? Are these people not able to understand? You shouldn’t write an article on something you know nothing about

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love how these people have absolutely no shame. They make claims that are proven to be wrong time and again, and they just continue to pretend that they're a serious and credible publication staffed by people who know what they're talking about.