I've never really understood what the purpose of Conservapedia is. I don't see rightwingers cite it as a source or recommend to each other that they learn from it in the way I'd post a wikipedia article informatively. I also don't see them using it to logically destroy or troll libs. There's seemingly no broad push to lionise it as the last bastion of free speech like they do Rumble/Kick/Truth Social/Twitter. It's the most Old Man Yells at Cloud website since Timecube. Every article reads like a boomer version of .
I've never really understood what the purpose of Conservapedia is. I don't see rightwingers cite it as a source or recommend to each other that they learn from it in the way I'd post a wikipedia article informatively. I also don't see them using it to logically destroy or troll libs. There's seemingly no broad push to lionise it as the last bastion of free speech like they do Rumble/Kick/Truth Social/Twitter. It's the most Old Man Yells at Cloud website since Timecube. Every article reads like a boomer version of
.
It's like the ACP version of prolewiki. Entirely designed out of petty grievances of being correctly called out as wrong all the time.
wait I thought ProleWiki was pretty good, is it full of petty grievances?
No. Infrawiki is.