FRSO seems good on most things, but supports "upholding past treaties" with native Americans, which is somewhat of a red flag. PSL seems good but I've heard claims that they're not that good on the settler colonial issue either and lack proper democratic centralist structure. I don't know much about the WWP, but their 15 point programm doesn't mention landback at all. I know next to nothing about the other socialist parties/orgs on the US, so I can't give my opinion on them
As far as I can tell from an outsider viewpoint PSL is the org with the best lines and also has electric growth energy. The latter being incredibly important in terms of motivation of the membership and future prospects of the org.
It's doing something right to be an ML org actually seeing growth and popularity within the US.
PSL is not an explicitly ML org, although it seems like a lot of the membership is
I thought it was still at least nominally a Marcyite Trot org, but I'm happy to be corrected if that's not the case
I don't think it ever was. Marcyism in a Trot org was part of the path to a proper ML org for some of the founding members, that's all. Absolutely nobody considers them self a Trot in PSL.
That's good to hear. I heard conflicting takes on this when I was researching while trying to decide on an org
PSL is an explicitly ML org as far as I'm aware. It's ML, upholds Stalin who is part of their required reading, and is dem cent in structure aside from a few adaptations to allow critical issues to bypass command structure to avoid local abuses.
Willing to hear otherwise but I've never heard members or former members say otherwise.
Psl is a ml org. They are based on democratic centralism and the leninist principals of the second Internationale.