• AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don't actually think. I just know I'm right. Then whenever I'm in an argument I can just link the [word we're arguing about] wikipedia article. Since I'm right and wikipedia has objective information the argument is over every time and I win.

        • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The conversation was you linking a Wikipedia article, I was at least hoping you'd link like a book or something. Like we could have a discussion if you were trying to argue against authoritarianiam as defined by say Bakunin or some other anarchist thinker.

          Then I could respond with On Authority which argues that authority is a natural consequence of any organization and calling something authoritarian just means you're saying that it's a system that is able to successfully reproduce itself.

          You could also try to link "authoritarianism" to fascism, but again that is pointless because there's already a term for fascism, which is Fascism.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          You may as well talk to a wall. It would be about as useful although probably less frustrating.

              • Egon
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                deleted by creator

    • Egon
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      deleted by creator