So let's say, theoretically, kubrick-stare that someone were thinking of reading Settlers. Now, hypothetically speaking, shapiro-poplar what sort of praxis would this book entail from it's reader? Because, say, if someone were hypothetically expert-shapiro to read this book, they might want to know if they are going to obtain useful knowledge from it or merely hate their fellow labor aristocrat more than beforehand. Is the hypothetical cholesterol spike debate-me-debate-me worth the information gained from the hypothetical shapiro-gavel reading of this book? Is there enough helpful information for helping reduce the grip of global imperialism marx-war to justify this possible hit to my circulatory health?

  • ChaosMaterialist [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I would call it Simple, but not Easy. I had to teach myself small talk and really practice before I "got" it. I like to think of it like scaffolding; it's not technically necessary, but it greatly helps you build what you want.

    EDIT: It's also about practice. Organizing a small office party will get you used to the logistics of getting people towards a goal. It's also harmless, so any mistakes are easier to fix or ignore (not to mention stress), which serves the learning part of practice.

    • SocialistDovahkiin [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Tbf it's less that small talk isn't straightforward and more that it's painfully and excruciatingly hard to force myself through. Office parties and Trojan horsing in organizing is much easier in that sense

      • Clippy [comrade/them, he/him]
        ·
        18 hours ago

        that understandable alot of people find it difficult to do public speaking, maybe you can see if you can find a toastmaster near you?