• InevitableSwing [none/use name]
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Sometimes I add something like "blog" before:2019 to my searches because I want "old" google and not their shiny newer profoundly shitty search. Plus I tend to really like blog results. Wwithout before:2019 google is incredibly insistent in "helping" me by mostly (or entirely) ignoring the word "blog" even if it's in double quotes.

    • Clippy [comrade/them, he/him]
      ·
      8 hours ago

      huh thanks for the tip, being on the younger side i've always only ever used the main corporation websites - never really know how to venture outside the main lot

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Google calls such stuff advanced operators. They used to be fantastic tools. But the problem now is that google occasionally, intentionally breaks some of them to be "helpful". And you can't disable such help.

    • urmums401k [she/her, they/them]
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Letting corporations control how we access information was always a mistake. Historians will curse us, and the evidence will be a hole.

      There must be consequences for the fuckers who did this. They have names and addresses.

  • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I use ChatGPT to learn all kinds of stuff. I say it's replaced 50% of my searches. Not that it's always right, but neither is all the blogspam.

      • Owl [he/him]
        ·
        13 hours ago

        This restaurant has a terrible food safety rating so I just eat off their floor.

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          "I wave my arms blindly in the dark and every so often I touch something before tripping on the furniture"

        • Bureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Literally any thing that isn't trained on blogspam or notorious for making up shit. You're basically using a magic 8-ball to "learn" it just repeats what you say back at you. Its useless for research.

        • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers.

          If a human "expert" was a known liar and fantasist who never provided sources or footnotes - would you listen to them? And if you did - why?

    • MaoTheLawn [any, any]
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I think people are overly critical - it is alright for some things, and it has gotten things right for me before, but generally I have to spend so much time double checking that it's right that it isn't worth the time. If it gets a detail wrong 10-15% of the time, then I have to check it every time.

      I do find it useful for admin tasks though.