• gay_king_prince_charles [she/her, he/him]
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Those 15,000 aren't just combat roles and grindable meat; a lot of them are in support and technical roles. There are a lot of roles in which removing 1 person creates a sizable inconvenience for many and can harm operations. You are correct that trans people are overrepresented as saboteurs in the military, but almost all of those people joined pre-transition and seeing the contradictions of US empire radicalized them. The trans people who have transitioned and then joined are more often than not dyed-in-the-wool believers in the US empire who don't have the same opportunity for radicalization.

    • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not only depriving the military of those skillsets and capacities, but absorbing them for ourselves

      • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        2 hours ago

        There is no outlet to absorb these people though. They just go back to capitalism rather than joining the bolsheviks

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          Which is exactly why I think it's a bad thing that this is happening now. If this happened because they represented a threat in the order of the US military then it'd be a good thing, they'd join the communists. But the fact that it's just happening as a random action to pander to chuds is, in my estimation, an unforced W for American empire and the rare accidental strategic good move, denying the enemy (us!) a valuable advantage in the future.

        • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          Not en masse no, and I think developing the capacity to do so is gonna be an increasingly good bet as things get more tense, fractious and doomy