Or is it so strong that any misstep taken by the bourgeois from the permitted boundaries of the current stage of development and planning results in the highest punishment permissible by law?
The 2 year reprieve means he has a pretty good chance it turns into a life sentence, that is if he cooperates with the authorities and doesn't commit any further crimes.
Killing people is almost always gratuitous for a fairly-developed country that isn't at war. They should probably be killing fewer people, especially among segments of society more vulnerable than billionaires.
[...] NGOs, and policy makers attempting to reform the use of capital punishment in many countries such as Trinidad, Malaysia, India, Pakistan, Taiwan and Japan.
Or is it so strong that any misstep taken by the bourgeois from the permitted boundaries of the current stage of development and planning results in the highest punishment permissible by law?
The 2 year reprieve means he has a pretty good chance it turns into a life sentence, that is if he cooperates with the authorities and doesn't commit any further crimes.
Killing people is almost always gratuitous for a fairly-developed country that isn't at war. They should probably be killing fewer people, especially among segments of society more vulnerable than billionaires.
They are: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/research-index/impact-index/death-penalty-china-road-reform
Aren't you forgetting someone? 🤔
That's better than the alternative, but they should still not be killing people. There just isn't a good reason for them to.