edited: to put entire article in body of post, instead of just beginning & end.

A law amendment in Iraq has proposed capital punishment for homosexual relationships. Campaigners have called it a “dangerous” escalation in the country where people already face frequent attacks and discrimination. However, life for queer Iraqis hasn’t always been this way. As with so many stains on worldwide human rights, the worsening homophobia and transphobia in Iraq can be traced back to the British empire.

Iraq: debating the death penalty for LGBTQ+ people

The amendment to a 1988 anti-prostitution law passed a first reading in parliament last week. It would enable courts to issue “the death penalty or life imprisonment” sentences for “homosexual relations”. This is according to a document seen by Agence France-Press (AFP). The amendment would also set a minimum seven-year prison term for “promoting homosexuality”.

Currently, no existing laws explicitly punish homosexual relations. However, the state has prosecuted LGBTQ+ people for sodomy, or under vague morality and anti-prostitution clauses in Iraq’s penal code. This also comes at a time when the state and the media are also cracking-down on open discussion about LGBTQ+ issues.

The national media and communications commission is considering banning Iraq-based publications from using the term “homosexuality”. Instead, it would advise media outlets to use the derogatory term “sexual deviance”. It also wants to ban the term “gender”.

‘Abnormal social phenomena’, apparently

The law change appears to have broad support in the Islamist-majority assembly. Saud al-Saadi is member of Shiite Muslim party Huquq, the political wing of the powerful Iran-aligned Hezbollah Brigades and part of the ruling coalition. He said the amendment was “still under discussion and subject to exchanges of viewpoints”. Saadi said a second reading had yet to be scheduled, and argued that parliament aims to “fill a legal vacuum”.

Lawmaker Sharif Suleiman of the Kurdistan Democratic Party said the proposed legislation reflects:

our moral and human values and our fights against abnormal social phenomena… We need deterrent laws.

‘My life will end’

A 2022 report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) and non-governmental organisation IraQueer found that people often target LGBTQ+ Iraqis with “kidnappings, rapes, torture and murders”. The state fails to punish the perpetrators. LGBTQ+ rights researcher at HRW Rasha Younes called the new proposed legislation as a “dangerous step”. She told AFP:

That means that Iraqi individuals’ life and constant fear of being hunted down and killed by armed groups with impunity is now going to translate into the law itself.

The Iraqi government (is) using the rights of LGBT people to distract the public from its lack of delivery.

The surge in anti-LGBTQ sentiment has stoked further fear among members of the community. Iraqi gay man Abdallah told AFP:

The situation has become too complicated because we are not protected by the authorities. If someone finds out that I’m gay and has a problem with me, they can send my name or photo to armed groups. My life will end.

It is likely Iraqi politicians will pass the law – and it can be directly linked back to Britain’s colonial influence.

Colonialism: bringing homophobia to Iraq and the Middle East

Historically, Iraq and other countries in the Middle East were not as homophobic as they are today. Rather, the Ottoman empire – part of which would later become present-day Iraq – was relatively permissive of homosexuality, particularly if it was kept out of the public eye.

Then, as History wrote:

Britain seized Iraq from Ottoman Turkey during World War I and was granted a mandate by the League of Nations to govern the nation in 1920. A Hashemite monarchy was organized under British protection in 1921, and on October 3, 1932, the kingdom of Iraq was granted independence.

But the damage was already done. The Economist explained that:

In 1885 the British government introduced new penal codes that punished all homosexual behaviour. Of the more than 70 countries that criminalise homosexual acts today, over half are former British colonies. France introduced similar laws around the same time. After independence, only Jordan and Bahrain did away with such penalties.

Britain forced its anti-LGBTQ+ laws onto Iraq (as it did most of its colonies). Negative societal attitudes and state criminalisation have remained ever since.

Now, it’s LGBTQ+ Iraqis feeling the full effects of the legacy of British colonialism.

  • itaOIAGJjkdslkgj@lemm.ee
    hexbear
    31
    10 months ago

    Blaming Britain for a 150 year old law instead of a clearly bigoted and distinctively intolerant religion and theocracy is an insane take.

    This is actually pants on head stupid.

    • @eatmyass
      hexbear
      10
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • @Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      hexbear
      3
      10 months ago

      I had to click through a few things to find out where this remarkable piece of journalism came from, figuring it must be a former colony with a chip on their shoulder.

      Canary.co is a British publication lol

    • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
      hexbear
      1
      10 months ago

      Passing the blame of current laws onto British from 150 years ago is also inherently racist because it requires the current people of Iraq to be without free will. They are their own people and make their own decisions.

      • @eatmyass
        hexbear
        7
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        deleted by creator

          • @eatmyass
            hexbear
            6
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • BelieveRevolt [he/him]
              hexbear
              4
              10 months ago

              I thought Iraq was supposed to be a Free Democracy after the war, which was necessary because those pesky Iraqis couldn't make the decision to overthrow Saddam even after 500,000 children died due to sanctions? Whatever happened with that thinking-about-it

  • @apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
    hexbear
    14
    10 months ago

    Blaming the creation of a new law on anybody except the lawmakers is a pretty shit take, but blaming it on 150 year old colonialism is actually infantilistic.

    • @eatmyass
      hexbear
      8
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • silent_water [she/her]
        hexbear
        18
        10 months ago

        this is ahistorical. as the article notes:

        Historically, Iraq and other countries in the Middle East were not as homophobic as they are today. Rather, the Ottoman empire – part of which would later become present-day Iraq – was relatively permissive of homosexuality, particularly if it was kept out of the public eye.

          • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
            hexbear
            11
            10 months ago

            History doesn't occur in a vacuum though.

            Why is it also present in Indonesia, a Muslim nation colonized by the Dutch

            Please read the Jakarta Method. Indonesia was trying to build up some kind of socialist system after Dutch rule. The democratically elected leader was a member of the Communist party but overall was not forcing a hard revolution. The US manufactured a right-wing military coup that would go on to execute nearly a Million members of the communist party, imprison over a million more, and lead the country down a right wing reactionary path. Indonesia pre-coup was is almost unrecognizable compared to modern Indonesia.

            Iran was never directly colonized

            The 1953 coup strengthened the shah and changed power to be far more pro-west interests, imperialism in a mask. The later Iranian revolution was again, a reaction to the more or less puppet regime. I don't think anyone on the left has more than a critical support for Iran to self govern. Of course not all changes or revolutions are a blanket good.

            Generally the support for Islam on the left is a counteraction to Islamophobia in the west, where Muslims are written off as terrorists due to the multiple decades of war waged in the Middle East.

            I personally know non-muslim brown people called "Terrorist" in predominantly white school districts in the early 2010s. This racism didn't go away, and it won't go away by demanding people to surrender their religion in the name of anti-homophobia. Doing so, claiming they're generally homophobic is the same as generalizing them all as terrorists.

    • @NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      hexbear
      1
      10 months ago

      It's The Canary, they're Corbynistas who will take any opportunity to shit on the UK.

        • @NuPNuA@lemm.ee
          hexbear
          6
          10 months ago

          Ok, I've been critical of HBs emoticons, but that's bizarre enough is made me laugh at the sight of it. I have no idea what if means, but well done.

          • Abracadaniel [he/him]
            hexbear
            3
            10 months ago

            It's "Long Corbyn"

            https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/05/10/labour-suffering-long-corbyn-no-known-cure/

  • @NuPNuA@lemm.ee
    hexbear
    7
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    So the point is we should have held onto our colonies so their laws could have changed with ours right?

    Edit - I didn't think this would need an /s but clearly it does.

    • Grimble [he/him,they/them]
      hexbear
      14
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Little weasely quietist fuck. You know exactly why you came here.

      You dont believe this, and are just doing a classic forum debate trick by mixing up viewpoints, so I assume you know already that LGBTQ people would be worse off still under colonialism. Nobody will buy this trick.

      I can tell you're just itching to argue, which is the purpose of your whole account, so this is all you'll get from me. You'll keep replying anyway, and wasting your life. To anyone else, I challenge you to make this guy quit Lemmy as quick as possible.

    • BelieveRevolt [he/him]
      hexbear
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      At this rate, the UK's laws will change to match Iraq's. J.K. Rowling and her fascist buddies are probably already drooling at the opportunity to execute trans people.

      • @NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        hexbear
        2
        10 months ago

        I can't see us getting that bad, I am concerned about the influence of people like her though, Starmer not standing up for LGBT rights has been disappointing.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      hexbear
      4
      10 months ago

      Edit - I didn't think this would need an /s but clearly it does.

      The fediverse leans left overall, but there are still plenty of reactionaries around.

      • @sizeoftheuniverse@programming.dev
        hexbear
        1
        10 months ago

        It's not leaning on the left, it's collapsing into the left, and once you pass the event horizon of leftism, you cannot entertain any kind of dialogue or what "normies" are calling sanity or common sense.

    • @eatmyass
      hexbear
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
    hexbear
    2
    10 months ago

    that doesn't really make sense Iraq is it's own country independence means that they are now responsible for their own laws. Also what do you want britain to do at this point everyone old enough to have been involved in the 1920 colonisation of Iraq is dead now

    blaming everything about iraq now on a 10 year period 100 years ago is ridiculous

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      hexbear
      4
      10 months ago

      The status quo is hard to change. The British are responsible for changing the status quo from "don't really care" to "illegal." That also has effects on how people grow up thinking about LGBT rights, which is how you get support for a law that's ratcheting up the oppression.

      I don't think this article should be read as "the Brits are fully responsible, period," but as an example of how the many harms of colonialism still leave marks today.