Permanently Deleted

  • GarfieldYaoi [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sometimes I zero in on housing, and NIMBY liberals are their own unique brand of annoying:

    "Anyone who's white should move out of cities in blue states and StAy AnD fIgHt in the red states they came from. Wait, what's an invisible minority? Why am I not moving to red states?" Well, ummmm....."

    "Stop being entitled and stay in your suburb in the boonies, no one owes you a city life!" (The nanosecond they have something, they start doing the whole bootstraps thing)

    "We appreciate that you're trying to save the world, but go save the world somewhere else." an actual quote. They know building more housing is the right thing to do, but they're invested in real estate.

    "Just move to Texas/the midwest, bro."

    "There's plenty of housing, just please PLEASE live in the boring suburbs in bumfuck nowhere far away from me! Sure, I'll call you redneck trash for doing so, but I need you there so I can have someone to feel superior to!" (not an actual quote, obviously. But this is sort of how they think)

    A lot of lib NIMBYism boils down to trying to keep blue cities in blue states as exclusive as possible. Yeah, the dems suck ass, but if I could afford to, I would have fucked off to San Francisco a long time ago.

    • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      City NIMBYs and YIMBYs drive me crazy.

      On one hand you have people who refuse to build anything claiming neighborhood character. On the other side you have people who have complete irreverence the real aspect of what actually gives cities their unique character.

      Like I wish people would:

      1: admit architecture unique to regions has played a role in the overall feel of a city

      2: admit that not everything plays a big role in #1.

      3: Stop doing the leg work for corporate developers who price people out of neighborhoods, turning every area in to a large scale wholefoods themed downtown disney.

      There's no winning. Modern developers are doing that thing to cities they did to suburbs. Essentially corporate development architecture and planning that makes nearly every suburban area completely indistinguishable from the next. So many of the new housing developments are in-fact poorly built, lowest bidder 500 sqft micro-apartments that cost a ton to rent out with like 2 affordable units. They're ugly and destroy whole city blocks.

      BUT

      Not all of these old buildings are worth saving. I'm partial to the old greenpoint multi-family row houses and all the other old brooklyn brick. I wish developers would use more brick. Stop for the love of god with the garish plastic siding. Otherwise, keep building.

      The Domino factory development is an example of a really cool way to re-develop. Gut the inside of the landmark, build inside of it. Making the area useful without knocking down this thing that generations of NYers enjoy seeing.

      Sure its probably not very affordable inside and me saying all this might make me a :libLIB

      idk this is a silly rant, but I genuinely love to visit new cities and see neighborhoods unique to the area. I hate that our system makes it so the only option to get people into homes is to make everything feel like some Raytheon Acres "Luxury Apartment Home™". For the love of god find an architect and some eccentric real estate VC to make something nice. I want to see weird local shops ran by just some guy. I want less corporate chains making everything the same everywhere. It's so depressing.