it good

    • blahaj [none/use name]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 years ago

      no

      You know he's growing rapidly so y'all will have to deal with him in the future anyways, right?

        • blahaj [none/use name]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          4 years ago

          they do affect the political landscape and the people that you want to change the world with, correct?

            • blahaj [none/use name]
              hexagon
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              4 years ago

              he is a youtube debate streamer that is growing fast, he does game streams every other day to relax. What about that? Is Pewdiepie unpolitical or not?

                • blahaj [none/use name]
                  hexagon
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  yes ofc pewdiepie is a shithead. Pewdiepie was my argument that shitty right-wing influencers can affect millions of shitty kids and vaush does the same in the other direction

                  • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    pewdiepie turns terminally online teenagers into terminally online neo-nazis, vaush turns terminally online teenagers into terminally online liberals

                    • blahaj [none/use name]
                      hexagon
                      arrow-down
                      8
                      ·
                      4 years ago

                      I don't really trust your judgement here, you started saying that vaush was a sexpest... Now you are saying a sexpest turns people into liberals? Wouldn't he be dangerous if he were a sexpest?

                      • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        4 years ago

                        if you think being incredibly sexually inappropriate is tied to political leanings, you must be very naive

                            • blahaj [none/use name]
                              hexagon
                              arrow-down
                              8
                              ·
                              4 years ago

                              yeah I just think that you are not familiar with his content and that's where your weird criticism comes from

                              • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
                                ·
                                4 years ago

                                which part of my criticism is wrong?

                                that he's a sexpest?

                                there have been multiple accusations made against him

                                that he's a liberal?

                                he has read no theory, he isn't an anarchist, he is barely left at all, he's just a radlib

      • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        yes

        no, no one who isn't a terminally online teenager gives a fuck about breadtubers in the first place, let alone some weird petite-bourgeios pretend anarchist