After the network showed a clip of a young conservative activist saying that climate change was the number one issue for young voters, Fox News moderator Martha MacCallum asked for a show of hands in response to her question, “Do you believe human behavior is causing climate change?”

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis refused to participate, and then GOP presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy declared, “I’m the only person on the stage who isn’t bought and paid for, so I can say this: The climate change agenda is a hoax.” A crowd full of Republicans started to boo.

Most of the Republicans on stage fell short of completely denying that climate change is caused by human activity. Ramaswamy, perhaps taking a page out of the Trump playbook of making the most outlandish comment possible, came right out and said it.

Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie shot back, “I’ve had enough already tonight of a guy who sounds like ChatGPT.” Former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley went so far as to venture, “Climate change is real.”

But moderator Bret Baier seized not on Ramaswamy’s blatant denial of the scientific consensus on climate change, but on his claim that he was the only candidate on the stage who was “not bought and paid for.” Baier took turns asking candidates, “Are you bought and paid for?” In classic Fox News fashion, a moment that could have provided insight into how far Republicans are willing to go to please young voters concerned about the environment devolved into senseless crosstalk. Still, for a party that has spent years ignoring or denying the biggest threat to our planet’s future, tonight’s responses were actually, almost, a little bit refreshing.

  • hansl@lemmy.ml
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s even funnier when considering they could suggest climate denying policies and still don’t.

    They have no platform. Literally. Not even a regressive one.

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      ·
      10 months ago

      Them having a platform is irrelevant. Trump is going to be the nominee, almost certainly even if he's actually found guilty and ends up in prison (which I doubt will ever happen). This is all just a marketing exercise for the other candidates.

      Also if they're getting booed for denying climate change(?), then they're better off just being silent on the campaign trail while continuing to support the oil sector once in office. Hell, they could even pivot to what the dems do by campaigning on it and doing nothing if their base starts to make it an issue.

      • hansl@lemmy.ml
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m talking about the republicans overall. In the general they better have a platform but it seems this is going to be a repeat of 2020.

        • barrbaric [he/him]
          ·
          10 months ago

          I mean yeah. All they need to do is say "woke" a bunch of times and they'll be within spitting distance of the presidency.

            • barrbaric [he/him]
              ·
              10 months ago

              Not until Biden starts saying it (not that I'd rule this out lol, the man's a segregationist).

            • HornyOnMain
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              That wouldn't be a problem if so many far left people weren't so insufferably woke. You can pretend it's something made up by the right - but I've voted Labour all my life and I'm sick to death of wokeness.

              I wonder why so many trans people become communists when even the supporters of the left wing liberal parties openly oppose their existence 🤔

                • UlyssesT [he/him]
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  It's just insanity.

                  Fuck off with that ableist "people that disagree with me are mentally ill and mental illness is for bad people" shit.

                    • UlyssesT [he/him]
                      ·
                      10 months ago

                      you've just proved my point for me.

                      You had no point to make except you're a bigoted piece of shit.

                      You just want to score moral outrage points

                      Outrage about outrage is still outrage, except you're outraged that people care too much.

                      because you're a narcissist.

                      You're projecting, hard.

                      Conversations with people like you are never productive

                      Then shut the fuck up and stop replying, you bigoted piece of shit.

            • volcel_olive_oil [he/him]
              ·
              10 months ago

              [surreptitiously speaking into walkie-talkie]: "labour voter spotted. send in the wokes"

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              ·
              10 months ago

              That wouldn't be a problem if so many far left people weren't so insufferably woke.

              Get that divisive nazbol shit out of here, bootlicker.

              • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
                ·
                10 months ago

                Ahh yes, calling people nazis and boot lickers isn't divisive.

                You people are the new Christian Right from the 90s.

                • UlyssesT [he/him]
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ahh yes

                  reddit-logo style opener. I know everything after that is going to be smug centrist garbage.

                  calling people nazis and boot lickers isn't divisive.

                  Fuck you. It's stupid to not divide away from nazis and nazi enablers. Sit down with ten nazis, you just made a table of eleven nazis.

                  You people are the new Christian Right from the 90s.

                  And you're the same kind of useless liberal that let Hitler take the chancellorship and thought it was a smart compromise.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      ·
      10 months ago

      "My goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub." - Grover Norquist

      That's always been their platform. They just don't say the quiet part out loud very often.

      • n0m4n@lemmy.ml
        ·
        10 months ago

        Republicans tell their base that they want to cut government, but always act otherwise. Controlling government purse strings is political power and economic power. There may be shell games played that transfers spending, but Republicans do not cut government, nor their power.

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          ·
          10 months ago

          They cut government, so that corporations can wield more control. Eliminate public schools over private. Deregulate so that corporations can pollute or scam as much as they want. Or just slash government to "prove" that government is worthless, so that they can slash government even more.

          They don't need government. They just need government to disappear. They believe in corporatocracy.