I tried to copy it but interestingly the character limit here is less than reddit's and it is a long post.
Basically most of it is arguing that a Trump win is better for anti-imperialists. A position I agree with. I think they present some compelling arguments.
I don't buy it. Under Trump we've seen pretty much the exact level of Imperialist aggression that I would have expected under anybody else, the only meaningful pushback Trump made against the deep state in that respect was when he backed down on Iran. But there's no reason to suspect a Democrat would have started a war with Iran instead, they would have pushed the exact same sanctioning regime that we've seen from the Trump admin.
Going forward, what do we expect from Biden that we wouldn't expect from Trump? Would Trump say "no" if the Joint Chiefs or whoever came forward with a plan to coup Venezuela? If Bolivia nationalizes some foreign-owned capital in response to the coup, is there a scenario where Biden sanctions them in response and Trump doesn't? Let's not forget that the whole situation with Iran was the result of Trump tearing up a deal worked out under Obama, and that he also threw out the plan to normalize relations with Cuba.
The only arguments people have that Trump might be better on the imperialist front is that a) he's personally friends with Putin etc, b) he's too cowardly to start a war, and c) he puts incompetent people in charge and they bungle everything. The first one is bunk - he seemed to like Kim Jong Un at first too but turned on a dime when he sensed that saber rattling at the DPRK would play well to his base. The second one is as true of any Democrat as it is of Trump. and the third one isn't real in the way you think it is - Trump didn't appoint the guys who got caught trying to sneak into Venezuela any more than Kennedy appointed the guys who tried to invade the Bay of Pigs. If the deep state is incompetent then that is not a function of the person in the Oval Office.