I tried to copy it but interestingly the character limit here is less than reddit's and it is a long post.
Basically most of it is arguing that a Trump win is better for anti-imperialists. A position I agree with. I think they present some compelling arguments.
why is that?
Because your "History lessons" on European socialist movements have less research put into them than the average reddit post, and when corrected you just don't respond, your conclusions based on your complete lack of research are not congruent with what little facts you have managed to gain, and all the while you basically slander entire movements. And what's really galling is that they could be improved a hundrethfold by like two seconds on wikipedia.
Yes, with this explanation of yours everything becomes clear! Thank you for showing me with facts and logic how bad i am.
No problem, it's always nice to clear up some confusion. And in future your posts could be less fucking awful.
Obviusly i was being ironic. But it does not matter, seems the discussion is over.