I think it was edited, but thinking about, even if they did say something shitty there (Which is how I remember it), that doesn't actually justify the other guy's reaction. I am overreacting to a half forgotten memory.

This shit is me being mad at something that is now deleted and I can't prove. So I guess I should just delete.

Uhh, are you seeing something I'm not. 'cus that's just blank for me? If literally everyone is seeing something on that page except me that disproves it, I guess I misremembered the whole, and in that case I'm sorry.

If there's just nothing, I retain my private grudge.

So, yeah, the OP is deleted, and it contained some shitty things which... uhh, now I can't prove. So that's my case completely fucking screwed, and I can't prove shit. I don't expect anyone to believe me given that I guess. I'm still fucking mad though.

fuck it

man fuck it

Oh man. I have been gone from this site for a while, and I return to this kind of bullshit drama. I'm starting to remember why I left. No, being indigenous does not absolve you of moral culpability for your actions. If eating meat is wrong, it is wrong regardless of your culture. If eating meat is wrong because it is an enormous resource drain, then it does not stop being a resource drain because you're not white. If eating meat is wrong because animals are sentient creatures who feel pain and deserve compassion, this does not stop because the person doing it grew up in a culture where that is normalised. While vegan rhetoric may be problematic, and evoke racist imagery concerning chinese people in a discussion about dog meat, the idea that it is racist and shuts you out of the discussion when I say "Eating meat is murder" is quite frankly nonsense.

Incredibly lame. Well I guess I'll find another place to haunt.

Rebr0 had the correct approach with banning and I should have realized that sooner. We should have banned shitheads more often previously, we will be correcting for this moving forward. Maintain Rebr0 thought.

Yeah, no. If this is even remotely serious I'm out. That shit was toxic as fuck, and just made everything worse. It was shit then, and as the fallout of the nonsense that just transpired showed, it also made shit worse here. Constant and arbitrary banning just makes everyone upset, and you start bleeding users.

I feel like the fact that literally all the other Romanovs fucking loathed Alexandra isn't brought up enough when discussing how terrible the execution of the royal family was, like half of them were either fantasising about, or actively planning, couping her, throwing her in prison, or murdering her. Like I just learned this today.

The british monarchy's relationship to indigenous people is just weird. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Philip_Movement

deleted by creator

If i twasn't a kids show you couldn't have scenes like this , where John is trying to lure his lost dogs unto a flatbed truck by dangling sausages from his enormous penis.

So the Danish right wing is really made about a kid's show, called "John Dillermand" (Roughly translates to "John Dick"), a kid's show where the protagonist has a magical, sentient, prehensile penis, and goes on adventures.

No part of this is made up.

This confirms my theory that the mods disabled downvotes so they could post cringe.

Even crispy it just tastes like crispy boogers.

I never said it had the texture of snot. I said it looks like snot that's gone bad, because it does. Especially with the stringy shit between the beans.

No, Mao's three world theory is different materially from third worldism. Maoist third worldism builds on his ideas but is not purely Mao. (Hence why it's not just "Maoism"). Mao specifically and repeatedly referred to the proletariat of the first world (Which he defined as the US and the USSR)

They're gonna ban you again because they think it's funny. It's actually kinda shitty tbh.

Is the bit that you're posting a mao emote on a post Mao would call you a fucking lib for?