On AWS Firecracker – but there are other new micro-VM engines around, too
  • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
    ·
    10 months ago

    I like the idea of FreeBSD, but I can't see the point of giving up on my Linux conveniences to switch over to it. What advantages does it provide, and are they worth the switch, considering I'm losing a lot of software, as well as any semblance of gaming?

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      ·
      10 months ago

      What advantages does it provide

      ZFS, mostly. There are some smaller peripheral things (like much better manpages), but these days the big one is probably ZFS. Zero licensing conflicts allows it to be an integral part of the kernel.

      • lnxtx@feddit.nl
        ·
        10 months ago

        FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE switched to the OpenZFS implementation[1]:

        The ZFS implementation is now provided by OpenZFS. 9e5787d2284e (Sponsored by iXsystems)

        So no big differences now, except for the licensing.

        [1] https://www.freebsd.org/releases/13.0R/relnotes/

          • raptir@lemdro.id
            ·
            10 months ago

            Linux is licensed under the GPL, which is described as "copyleft." The GPL requires that if you want to use GPL code you need to license your modified code under the GPL.

            FreeBSD is licensed under the BSD license, which is a permissive license. Basically as long as you stick the license statement in your documentation you can do whatever you want with BSD-licensed code. This is why commercial uses (like the Wii's OS) tend to be BSD-based rather than Linux-based.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        ·
        10 months ago

        like better manpages

        I want them now! I want the better manpages! Has someone decided to create inproved manpages for Linux? I think this could be a great idea for a project or an organisation. Manprove, the organisation to improve Unix manual pages.

        • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
          ·
          8 months ago

          Isn't this actually impossible because manpages are maintained by distros? And the benefit of freedbsd being everything is created by the same team? Aka FreeBSD being a complete distro and not just a kernel?

    • Solaris1789@jlai.lu
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unbreakably stable, cohesive (no need to fit and manage tens of different pieces to get a get a functionning OS), performant, bhyve, BSD licensed (can be a pro or con tho). It has quite a lot of stuff that makes it worthy of Linux or other BSDs.

      EDIT: Almost forgot ZFS.

    • quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org
      ·
      10 months ago

      There's an old saying: "Linux users use Linux because they hate Windows. BSD users use BSD because they love Unix." Obviously this is not true for every individual user, but I think it describes a trend or pattern.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wanted to comment on this being a cool read, but there's too much happening in this thread that is beyond my knowledge. But anyway, cool that this guy is optimizing things like a mofo.