What makes ChatGPT-4's weakening all the more tragic is the realization that it was not borne out of technological limitations or unforeseeable glitches, but rather political concerns and a hyper-cautious approach to public reaction.
The reality is that these ethical barricades can sometimes stifle the very progress they purport to guide, casting a shadow over what could otherwise be a platform for rich, meaningful discourse.
I bet I could make him reconsider this by arguing postmodernism proliferated in part by technological innovation. And if he believes that all technological progress is good, then so are the things that derive from it.
I bet I could make him reconsider this by arguing postmodernism proliferated in part by technological innovation. And if he believes that all technological progress is good, then so are the things that derive from it.
ChatGPT output is almost the definition of post-modernism - all is text, there's no underlying meaning.
..is now canon