Permanently Deleted

  • Pisha [she/her, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I'm also saying Baldur's Gate 3. The writing is juvenile, the combat is a slog, the characters are cliches, it retcons the story and characters of the game it's supposed to be a sequel to, it has possibly a worse UI than the original Baldur's Gate, and the famed reactivity and choice only works if you do things exactly how the developers intended you to do them. Oh, and the music is just forgettable.

    • GeorgeZBush [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The writing is juvenile, the combat is a slog, the characters are cliches

      The authentic DnD experience

      • SocialistWombat [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        If BG3 doesn't have at least one dick joke then the entire medium is a failure.

    • UlyssesT
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • batsforpeace [any, any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you think it's better to take the time to replay 1 and 2 before trying 3, or are the retcons so bad that it's better to not even know what happened earlier in the story? I played a bit of 1 a long time ago and don't remember anything.

      • Pisha [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don't think you'd gain much enjoyment of 3 by replaying the originals. The characters that come back are basically just for fanservice and the story kind of acknowledges the premise of the originals but conflicts heavily with Throne of Bhaal. Other than that, there's just a few written jokes referencing various old characters. So if you want to play 3, just go for it.