EDIT: no, I don't sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they're losing an argument ;)

    • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it has not been far right since 1776. I guess when you make up facts it's easy to prove your point though.

      By the way, when's the glorious peoples revolution supposed to begin? More importantly, where are the people???

      • commiewithoutorgans [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Read Liberalism A Counter History or shut up about shit you don't understand.

        The people already revolted in the worlds largest country and their success will convince people to make similar steps once it's made obvious you're being fucked by your far right regimes. The people are hungering in most of the world and they will stand up you brain wormed fucker

        • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
          ·
          1 year ago

          Read this book I just read last month or you don't know anything!

          It's funny, no matter how many reading assignments I actually partake in, it's never enough. Perhaps your movement would be more successful if you spent less time alienating anyone right of Ho Chi Minh.

            • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
              ·
              1 year ago

              Funny you mention that. Whenever I do cite any "theory" that I have read, you well-read individuals somehow always disappear and avoid discussing anything. I'm sure you'll either A) do the same thing or B) move the goalposts all the way to Laos/Cambodia.

              https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/2650764

              • commiewithoutorgans [he/him, comrade/them]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lol is that your best fuckin example? You didn't cite Marx lol you just misunderstood an analysis for a method and made a shit argument. You didn't deserve a good reply and dont now. I'm all for whatever analyses come out to peacefully move forward, but you're just preserving the current world for your benefit not trying to prevent some deaths or something. Millions die yearly to preventable causes which would end with global socialism.

                • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I have never had the opportunity to have a more in-depth discussion because you guys seem more interested in smugly acting more intelligent than everyone, forgetting you need to recruit "people" to have a "people's revolution".

                  Since you're one of the wise leaders of the revolution, what is your plan to bring your superior ideologies to the masses?

                  • commiewithoutorgans [he/him, comrade/them]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I'm not first bringing ideologies to the masses, it's first proving a method works and then explaining why and how. You do this through Analyze the rising maladies of a system, describe how they've come about and explain how the solution only moves in 1 direction, socialism. Now I'm not gonna waste time explaining at any more depth until you prove yourself to be someone at all worth my time here by showing you've read literally anything relevant to the discussion.

                    I'm not more intelligent than the masses, no in fact I think that this is precisely only how you can think. There are those who have the time to develop certain skills which can be applied to reaching the intelligence and needs of the masses and those for whom that time is difficult and they build expertise in their specific fields. A vanguard is exactly the people who learn how to learn from the masses, not the opposite. Lenin was beloved for his ability to do this, and Stalin soon after with similar astonishingly high approvals.

                    Let me remind you, you're the one who thinks you're smarter and better than those masses who had to perform revolution to improve their conditions. I think they're just better than you