EDIT: no, I don't sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they're losing an argument ;)

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I'm celebrating the increase in life expectancy from 35 to higher than that of the US, actually, which is the win I think it is.

    The point is not the immediate increase in that specific 5 year period, the point is the clear trend of rapid, long term increases after a long period of stagnation, with the pivitol turning point being exactly when the CPC came to power. You're supposed to look at the whole graph.

    • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
      ·
      1 year ago

      China never manipulates data coming out of their authoritarian country so good thing we can trust it. I'm sure their life expectancy is great with all their industrial pollution that regularly causes smog in their inner cities.

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Here is my source do you have a source that disputes that? Or is your belief based entirely on unfalsifiable faith?

        Also curious if you think Chinese life expectancy is still like 35 or what lmao

        You may also be interested in what the World Bank, that infamous communist propaganda rag, has to say:

        Over the past 40 years, the number of people in China with incomes below $1.90 per day – the International Poverty Line as defined by the World Bank to track global extreme poverty– has fallen by close to 800 million. With this, China has contributed close to three-quarters of the global reduction in the number of people living in extreme poverty.

            • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
              ·
              1 year ago

              Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand. In Fountainhead, she goes in depth about how Chinese life expectancy statistics are generally made up.

              • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand

                michael-laugh

                That's incredible, I honestly did not see that one coming.

                So tell me, what's your best guess at what Chinese life expectancy was before the CPC came to power, and what do you think it is now? Do you dispute the numbers from before the communists were even in power? Or do you think they're still living in mud huts?

                • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The Fountainhead is a novel about an American architect that has nothing to do with China. They're doing a weird bit, presumably about how evil tankies asking them to read books is cheating.

                  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yeah I got that, at least after they posted a rickroll. Guess being an idiot is a defense mechanism when they realized they had nothing.

                    • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Communism increasing life expectancy!?

                      Shanghai Stock Exchange: http://english.sse.com.cn/

                      Beijing Stock Exchange: www.bse.cn

                      Shenzhen Stock Exchange: https://www.szse.cn/English/index.html

                      That's more stock exchanges than the US, comrade!

                      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                        ·
                        1 year ago

                        Oh, so you consider Deng's reforms to be right-deviationist? Are you a Maoist, then?

                        Whether you consider the CPC to be communist or not, the fact still remains that they've made a lot of improvements in the lives of the average Chinese person.

                        • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          Deng was alive and well when two of those stock exchanges were opened and the whole argument was "look at the improvements only possible under Communism".

                          How do you say "moving the goalposts" in Mandarin? Actually, no need to answer as you are all suburban petit bourgeois kids from the US.

                          • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                            ·
                            1 year ago

                            Deng was alive and well when two of those stock exchanges were opened

                            That's... what I said? Obviously, Deng was the one who implemented economic reforms, such as opening stock exchanges and allowing foreign investment. Some Maoists consider this to be right-deviationist and counter-revolutionary, and that he should've continued more in line with Mao's policies. That's why I asked if you're a Maoist, since you consider his reforms incompatible with socialism.

                            I'm not sure who's whole argument was "look at the improvements only possible under Communism." China's conditions were much worse off than places like the US, so obviously it's possible to improve conditions to be better than per-revolutionary China (which is not saying much) without communism. It's just that in China's case, it was the communists that did it.

                              • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                                ·
                                1 year ago

                                Over 60, actually. I think that doubling live expectancy over a single generation is, in fact, pretty impressive.

                                So I take it you're not a Maoist or a Dengist. Can you tell me who you think should've been in power in China instead? The KMT? You can see how much they did on the graph, if you don't find the CPC's numbers impressive then I'm sure you'd hate them even more. The invading Japanese perhaps? The European colonizers? Or maybe you think the Qing dynasty should never have been overthrown.

                                • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                                  ·
                                  1 year ago

                                  Correlation or causation? You know that industrialization increases life expectancy, right?

                                  It's not hard to double your life expectancy when you're starting out with the same life expectancy that existed in the Roman Empire almost 2,000 years prior. Thanks, Mao!

                                  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                                    ·
                                    edit-2
                                    1 year ago

                                    Of course I know that, did you not read what I said?

                                    "China's conditions were much worse off than places like the US, so obviously it's possible to improve conditions to be better than per-revolutionary China (which is not saying much) without communism."

                                    It's not hard to double your life expectancy when you're starting out with the same life expectancy that existed in the Roman Empire almost 2,000 years prior. Thanks, Mao!

                                    It really is wild that no other faction was willing to do anything that would increase Chinese life expectancy above that of the Roman Empire, yes. I agree, thanks, Mao!

                                    It's pretty funny that you criticize Deng for implenting economic reforms that led to further industrialization, while also crediting the rise in life expectancy to that very same industrialization.

                                    What even is your ideology? And can you answer my question about who should've come to power instead of the communists?

                                      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                                        ·
                                        1 year ago

                                        I have no idea what thought process led you to post that but ok.

                                        There were a lot of really simple, basic improvements that the peasants in China desperately needed. Anybody could've done what was needed, but nobody else was willing to, because nobody else cared. There was no special technical economic policy that uplifted them, it was just a willingness to address their needs that no other faction possessed.

                                        • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                                          ·
                                          1 year ago

                                          The entire point of this brilliant thread is that communism, not individuals, lifted people out of poverty. Numerous economic systems have high life expectancy (socialist, capitalist, etc) and the common denominator is basically just industrialization.

                                          Who would have thought the ability to make nation-state quantities of medication extends lives?

                                          • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                                            ·
                                            edit-2
                                            1 year ago

                                            The entire point

                                            That's all you fam, I never said anything like that. All I did was point to graph and say I liked it when people do things (and political projects) that make life expectancy skyrocket. You seem to have read a bunch of stuff into that.

                                            • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                                              ·
                                              1 year ago

                                              I support whatever this is so idk what that makes me

                                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy

                                              I'm assuming you equally support all those capitalist countries that have high life expectancies. Samsung Korea I mean South Korea with it's life expectancy of 84 years is generally considered a great society on Hexbear, no?

                                              • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                                                ·
                                                edit-2
                                                1 year ago

                                                Life expectancy doesn't always give the whole picture. For example, in my graph, there are times where China's life expectancy is rising very rapidly, but it was still considerably lower than that of other countries. It's necessary to analyze what policies lead to what results and what the reasons are for the success or failure of a given political project or policy.

                                                I haven't studied South Korea's policies and material conditions closely enough to offer much of an informed analysis, as the world is a very big place. You could always make a thread about it on c/askchapo or something.

                                                • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                                                  ·
                                                  1 year ago

                                                  Life expectancy doesn’t always give the whole picture.

                                                  Could have saved us a lot of time, going all the way back to the post where you used life expectancy to try to paint a whole picture.

                                                  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                                                    ·
                                                    1 year ago

                                                    Just because it doesn't paint the full picture doesn't mean it isn't important. The data in this case shows some very clear conclusions.

                                                    Sometimes I try to post more in depth theory, the last time I tried that, everyone complained that it was TLDR.

                                                    • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                                                      ·
                                                      1 year ago

                                                      I mean this genuinely - It seems like you're one of the more reasonable Hexbear users, just for saying this alone:

                                                      I haven’t studied South Korea’s policies and material conditions closely enough to offer much of an informed analysis, as the world is a very big place.

                                                      Intelligence is always knowing where your current knowledge ends. I don't have all the answers to everything either and it's easier to engage in discussion when both participants know their limitations, which is the bare minimum required for a good faith discussion. Virtually all other Hexbear users double down and go on the offensive when they are hit with something they don't know about, which is why I've developed a particular disdain for users from your instance and refrain from substantial engagement because it always devolves into sealioning. The only way I have found to engage with users from your instance is reflexively using their own debate strategies otherwise I'm constantly told I "don't know anything unless I've read insert-book-of-the-week".

                                                      I used South Korea because it's pretty much worse than the US in every regard. My joke, "Samsung Korea", wasn't an ignorant American's take thinking all they make are cell phones, rather, Samsung is basically at the top of their oligarchy and has more control over their government than US corporations, believe it or not. South Korea has one of the best life expectancies, but is one of the worse examples of capitalism.

                                                      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                                                        ·
                                                        edit-2
                                                        1 year ago

                                                        I think your problem is that you jump to conclusions too quickly. I think you'll have better luck with Hexbears if you slow down and make sure you actually understand what our point is instead of just trying to win before you have a clear picture of what the other person's position is.

                                                        • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                                                          ·
                                                          edit-2
                                                          1 year ago

                                                          Oh well, double down I guess. A prominant Hexbear community is called "Dunking On Libs", which, as we both know, is going to other instances where they engage in "jumping to conclusions" and "just trying to win".

                                                          You almost had self awareness. Almost.

                                                          I'll leave you with what I wrote in my last post:

                                                          The only way I have found to engage with users from your instance is reflexively using their own debate strategies

                                                          • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                                                            ·
                                                            1 year ago

                                                            I can't speak for every user on my instance (nor can you for yours), but I can say that many of us also respond in kind to what we get. When you tried to dunk on me, you got PPB'd. You'll get the same if you lob baseless accusations (like calling us "the QAnon of the left") or confidently assert bad, uninformed takes.