That was certainly the excuse for Indian troops smashing down militias in Hyderaba
What's not there to support military action in Hyderabad (South India)? Don't confuse this with Kashmir.. in Hyderabad only the ruler didn't want to join in india, majority of population actively rebelled against the Nizam rule and had no reservations joining india. In Kashmir it's reverse, ruler accepted to join but majority population didn't which is why its considered imperialism
Ah I am not referring to take out the Nizam, rather I am referring to the Indian troops massacring the communist and peasant rebels that made up the Telangana movement under the pretenses that they wanted an independent Hyderabad state.
What's not there to support military action in Hyderabad (South India)? Don't confuse this with Kashmir.. in Hyderabad only the ruler didn't want to join in india, majority of population actively rebelled against the Nizam rule and had no reservations joining india. In Kashmir it's reverse, ruler accepted to join but majority population didn't which is why its considered imperialism
Ah I am not referring to take out the Nizam, rather I am referring to the Indian troops massacring the communist and peasant rebels that made up the Telangana movement under the pretenses that they wanted an independent Hyderabad state.