• post_trains [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Yes. Throw H*lvetia into the trash with the alleged “Belgium.”

    • Mardoniush [she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      When you become a country because of the 19th century equivalent of a Rage Against the Machine Concert

      • kristina [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        and casually commit extreme genocide within like 60 years of independence. world record?

        • aqwxcvbnji [none/use name]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Which won't be solved by spliting up the country, but will be solved by reparations, which the left in both linguistic groups in Belgium support.

    • aqwxcvbnji [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      In Belgium (and the Netherlands) this position is only supported by the most marginal elements of the far-right.

      On the broader Flemish right, there is agreement that it should split from the French-speaking part of the country, because (a) Flanders is richer and (b) the left parties and trade-unions are more strong in Wallonia* and Brussels. They believe it would be more easy to destroy social security and the welfare state in a split country than in a united one. Large media-corporations are on their side, and press is filled with stories about "lazy Francophone socialists"in support of Flemish-nationalist parties (especially during strikes and elections).

      For that reason, and not just some emotional attachment to a nation state, the left is in favour of unity among the working class. Divided the working class loses, united it wins.

      *Opinion polls in Wallonia now show that it will become the region with the strongest left in the EU, with around 60% of the vote going to the social-democrats, the greens and the communists (PTB).